Justinian can review any document you upload and provide analysis, risk identification, redline suggestions, improvement recommendations, and alternative clause language. Upload via the paperclip icon, then describe what you want Justinian to focus on.
Upload the document
Click the paperclip icon in the chat input bar and select the file (PDF, DOCX, or plain text). Multiple files can be uploaded for comparative review.
Describe your focus
Tell Justinian what to look for: liability exposure, IP ownership gaps, non-standard termination clauses, or compliance with a specific regulation.
Select the AI level
Use the Legal AI Twin level for the most thorough review — it accesses your eFirm data and trusted legal libraries for cross-referencing.
Review the output
Justinian returns a clause-by-clause analysis with severity ratings (High / Medium / Low), flagged issues, and recommended language.
Review Output Fields
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Clause Reference | Section / clause number in the original document | § 7.2 — Limitation of Liability |
| Risk Level | High / Medium / Low severity rating | High — uncapped indemnity |
| Issue Description | Plain-language explanation of the risk | No monetary cap on supplier's indemnification obligation |
| Recommendation | Suggested revision or alternative language | Cap indemnity at 100% of total fees paid under the agreement |
| Jurisdiction Note | Jurisdiction-specific enforceability comment | UAE courts may void uncapped indemnities under Federal Decree-Law No. 5/2023 |
Scenario
MSA Liability Review
A client sends you a Master Service Agreement from a US tech vendor. You need to identify every clause that exposes your client to uncapped liability before the next negotiation round.
Steps
Upload the MSA → Prompt: 'Review this MSA and identify every clause that exposes the client to uncapped liability. Flag severity and suggest capped alternatives.' → Justinian returns 8 flagged clauses with severity ratings and redline suggestions.
Result: Full risk register generated in under 2 minutes. Each flagged clause includes alternative language ready to paste into the redline.
Tip
Justinian produces redlined versions of documents within the Canvas editor with a built-in track changes feature. Changes are shown visually so you can accept or reject each modification individually.
Upload and prompt
Upload the document and describe the changes: 'Cap indemnification at total contract value, change governing law from English to DIFC law, add a 30-day cure period before termination, and delete the non-compete clause.'
Canvas editor opens
Justinian opens the document in the Canvas editor with all proposed changes visible as tracked changes — additions in green, deletions in red strikethrough.
Accept or reject
Review each change individually. Accept the ones you want, reject the ones you don't. You can also edit the proposed language before accepting.
Export the final version
Export the clean or marked-up version as DOCX or PDF for client delivery or counterparty negotiation.
Important
When negotiating a contract, Justinian generates alternative clause language for different outcomes. Ask for 3 levels: your preferred position, a reasonable middle ground, and the minimum acceptable position.
Fallback Language Levels
| Level | Strategy | Example (Indemnification) |
|---|---|---|
| Position A — Preferred | Maximum protection for your client | Indemnification capped at total fees paid; excludes consequential damages; 12-month survival period |
| Position B — Middle Ground | Balanced risk allocation | Indemnification capped at 2x fees paid in prior 12 months; includes direct damages only; 18-month survival |
| Position C — Walk-Away | Minimum acceptable terms | Indemnification capped at 3x annual fees; includes direct and indirect damages; 24-month survival; mutual indemnification |
Scenario
Negotiation Preparation
You're about to enter a 3-hour negotiation session for a technology licensing agreement. The counterparty's counsel has pushed back on 4 key clauses.
Steps
Upload the agreement → Prompt: 'For clauses 5.2 (IP ownership), 8.1 (indemnification), 12.3 (termination), and 14.1 (non-compete), generate 3 levels of fallback language: preferred, middle ground, and walk-away position. Frame from the licensor's perspective.' → Justinian returns a structured playbook.
Result: 12 alternative clause versions (3 per clause) generated in under 3 minutes. Walk into negotiations with a structured playbook — pivot instantly without drafting on the fly.
Process multiple documents from a data room and produce consolidated analysis. Attach 5-8 contracts at a time, ask for specific analysis, then consolidate individual reviews into a single due diligence report.
Batch upload documents
Attach 5-8 contracts at a time via the paperclip icon. Supported formats: PDF, DOCX, plain text.
Specify the analysis scope
Tell Justinian what to look for across all documents: change of control provisions, IP ownership clauses, material liabilities, termination risks, or assignment restrictions.
Review individual analyses
Justinian returns a per-document analysis with flagged issues, risk ratings, and key terms extracted.
Request consolidation
Ask Justinian to consolidate findings into a single due diligence report with a prioritized risk register and recommended conditions for the SPA.
Info
| Jurisdiction | Notice Period | Severance | Grounds |
|---|
Justinian knows all laws across all jurisdictions and languages. Compare provisions across multiple jurisdictions, assess compliance with specific regulations, or flag non-compliant provisions against recent law amendments.
Legislative Analysis Capabilities
| Capability | Example Prompt | Output |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-jurisdiction comparison | Compare employee termination provisions in UAE, UK, and France | Side-by-side table of notice periods, severance requirements, and procedural obligations per jurisdiction |
| Compliance gap analysis | Flag provisions in this employment contract that don't comply with DIFC Employment Law No. 2/2019 | List of non-compliant clauses with specific law references and suggested amendments |
| Legislative update impact | How does the new UAE Labor Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 33/2021) affect this employment agreement? | Clause-by-clause impact assessment with required amendments |
| Regulatory comparison | Compare data protection obligations under PDPL, GDPR, and CCPA | Comparative matrix of requirements, penalties, and compliance thresholds |
Summary
Upload any document for clause-level review, redlining with track changes, fallback language generation, data room analysis, and multi-jurisdictional legislative comparison.