Eudia vs HAQQ

Eudia started as, and mostly still is, a software platform: an 'augmented intelligence' layer that ingests a company's own contracts, policies and precedent to build enterprise legal agents for in-house teams. In July 2025 it acquired the ALSP Johnson Hana, adding 300+ legal professionals, to pair those agents with human lawyers under an 'Eudia Counsel' services brand for work like M&A.

That combination, software plus an acquired services arm, is why this reads as a law-firm-shaped comparison rather than a pure software one. HAQQ stays entirely on the software side: a platform a firm runs itself, never a services arm competing for the client's legal work.

Eudia's named clients, Cargill, DHL, Duracell and Coherent on the platform side, and Citibank, Morgan Stanley, Stripe, Tesco, Airbnb and Coca-Cola via Johnson Hana, are all enterprises buying for their own in-house legal, compliance or procurement function. Nothing in Eudia's public materials points to a law firm as the intended buyer.

That matters because an in-house department doesn't invoice anyone. HAQQ is built the other way round, with matters, time capture and invoicing wired in for a firm that bills its own clients.

Eudia's own pricing page returns a 404, the same result found checking Harvey's, so its pricing is quoted through a sales process rather than published. It raised up to $105M in a Series A led by General Catalyst (with $75M of that contingent on further acquisitions), and in August 2026 became a launch partner on Google Cloud's Gemini Enterprise for Legal alongside Accenture, Deloitte and KPMG.

HAQQ publishes its pricing outright, so a firm can answer what this costs without a procurement cycle.