Intapp vs HAQQ

Intapp trades on Nasdaq under ticker INTA and has been a public company since 2021. It was founded in 2002, and its own site states it serves more than 1,400 clients generating over $50,000 in annual recurring revenue each, including 97 of the Am Law 100 law firms. That is a real, verifiable enterprise track record most legal-tech vendors, including HAQQ, cannot yet claim.

Intapp says it has held SOC 2 and ISO/IEC 27001 certification (plus ISO 27017 and 27018 for cloud-specific and data-privacy controls) since at least 2017, audited by Schellman & Company. For a large firm's security review, that reported history carries real weight.

Intapp's product focus is conflicts checking, client intake, risk and compliance, and matter-adjacent workflow for large firms, deep, specialized tooling for a real operational problem big firms have. What Intapp's own materials don't describe is legal-drafting, contract-review or legal-research AI; that simply isn't the product category it competes in.

That makes Intapp and HAQQ a partial overlap rather than a direct swap: firms sometimes run both, using Intapp for risk and conflicts and a separate AI platform for drafting and research, because Intapp was never built to do the latter.

Intapp's site displays no pricing anywhere we could find, every path leads to "Schedule a demo." That is standard for enterprise software sold to Am Law 100-scale firms, but it means a smaller firm cannot self-evaluate cost the way it can with HAQQ's published tiers.

For a firm without an existing enterprise procurement process, that gap in transparency is a practical barrier, independent of whether Intapp's product itself is a good fit.