Qanooni vs HAQQ

Qanooni works where lawyers already work. HAQQ is where the whole matter lives.

11/15 features where HAQQ leads

The Bottom Line

Qanooni.ai is a credible UAE-based legal AI: drafting and review in Arabic and English, delivered inside Word and Outlook where lawyers actually work, backed by ISO 27001 and real funding. Meeting lawyers in Word is a genuine advantage and we rate it as one. The limit is that a plugin is not a practice. There is no matter, no client intake, no time capture, no invoice. HAQQ does the drafting and keeps everything around it in one system.

Word is a surface, not a system

Qanooni is strong inside the document. HAQQ connects the document to the matter, the client, the time entry and the bill, so nothing is retyped into another tool.

Research the drafting rests on

HAQQ researches with citations from statutes and case law, so a draft is grounded rather than generated from a prompt alone.

Wider than UAE and UK

HAQQ enforces jurisdiction across 200+ countries in seven languages, with native Arabic and full RTL.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Full support

Partial

Not available

Feature

Qanooni

HAQQ

AI Legal Drafting

AI Contract Review

Legal Research

Multi-Document Analysis

Risk Identification

Persistent Knowledge Base

Context-Aware AI

Practice Management

Billing & Invoicing

200+ Countries

7 Languages (incl. Arabic RTL)

Transparent Pricing

404 Not Foundchecked 2026-08-26

MS Word Integration

On-Premise Deployment

16 Free Legal Tools

Real venture backing behind the Word-plugin approach

Qanooni raised $2 million in pre-seed funding led by Village Global, with participation from Oryx Fund, part of Salica Investments, TA Ventures and angel investors — a genuine, independently reported funding round for a company founded in 2024 by Anuscha Iqbal, Ziyaad Ahmed and Karim Shiyab. That backing is validation for its specific bet: meeting lawyers inside Microsoft Word and Outlook rather than asking them to adopt a new standalone platform.

It holds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification, runs on Microsoft Azure, and states client data is not used to train its models — a real, verifiable security posture for a young company.

No public pricing, and claims we could not independently confirm

Qanooni's own pricing page returned a 404 Not Found response when checked by plain HTTP on 26 August 2026, a result anyone can reproduce; the site instead routes every evaluation through a demo request or an ROI calculator. Its homepage separately claims it is trusted by 150+ law firms across 11 countries and has 5,000+ live legal authority sources connected — we found these only as self-reported figures on Qanooni's own site, with no independent corroboration.

“404 Not Found” — checked 2026-08-26

A plugin inside the document, not the practice around it

Qanooni's four core capabilities — AI Draft, AI Review, Legal Research and Matter Summaries — all live inside Word, Outlook and the Microsoft 365 environment, which is a genuine convenience for a lawyer who does not want to leave their existing tools. What it does not appear to offer, based on its own published feature list, is client intake, time capture or invoicing connected to that drafting work.

HAQQ connects the same kind of drafting to the matter, the client and the bill in one system, rather than leaving the practice layer to whatever tools a firm already has around Word.

Which one should you pick?

Choose Qanooni

Your lawyers already live in Microsoft Word and Outlook and you want AI drafting, review and research delivered exactly there, with no new interface to learn.
You want a young, venture-backed vendor with real SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification and are comfortable with quote-based rather than published pricing.
Your practice is concentrated in the UAE and UK, Qanooni's stated markets.

Choose HAQQ

You want published pricing you can evaluate yourself, with a free tier, rather than a demo-and-quote process.
You need the drafting connected to a matter, a client and an invoice in one system.
You need jurisdiction coverage beyond the UAE and UK — HAQQ enforces jurisdiction across 200+ countries.

The verdict

Qanooni is a credible, venture-backed UAE legal AI that meets lawyers inside Word and Outlook, with real security certification behind it. HAQQ connects the same kind of drafting to matters, billing and jurisdiction coverage across 200+ countries, with published pricing.

Best for: UAE and UK firms that specifically want AI inside their existing Word and Outlook workflow; firms wanting one integrated platform with billing and broader jurisdiction need HAQQ instead.

Written by HAQQ. We make one of the two products compared here - read it as a vendor's argument, and check the linked sources. Qanooni · HAQQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Qanooni work inside Microsoft Word?

Yes, and that is one of its real strengths, with Outlook support as well. HAQQ works in the browser and mobile with Word export, and connects that drafting to matters, research and billing.

Is Qanooni secure enough for enterprise use?

It holds ISO 27001 certification. HAQQ holds ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and SOC 2, and offers an on-premise deployment option for data sovereignty requirements.

What does Qanooni cost?

Pricing is quote-based. HAQQ publishes its pricing, starting free with Pro at $20.83 per user per month including practice management.

Does Qanooni work inside Microsoft Word?

Yes — that is its core distribution approach, with Outlook support as well, and it is a genuine strength we would not dispute. HAQQ works in the browser and mobile with Word export, connecting that drafting to matters, research and billing.

What does Qanooni cost, exactly?

Pricing is not published; its /pricing page returned a 404 Not Found when we checked by plain HTTP on 26 August 2026, and evaluation runs through a demo or an ROI calculator instead. HAQQ publishes its pricing, starting free with Pro priced per lawyer per month.

How much funding has Qanooni raised?

It raised $2 million in a pre-seed round led by Village Global, with Oryx Fund, TA Ventures and angel investors participating — an independently reported figure, unlike some of its other homepage claims about client and country counts, which we found only as self-reported numbers.

More Comparisons

ADAdel vs HAQQ QAQaanoon vs HAQQ SHShwra vs HAQQ ADAdala AI vs HAQQ

See all comparisons

The Bottom Line

Word is a surface, not a system

Qanooni is strong inside the document. HAQQ connects the document to the matter, the client, the time entry and the bill, so nothing is retyped into another tool.

Research the drafting rests on

HAQQ researches with citations from statutes and case law, so a draft is grounded rather than generated from a prompt alone.

Wider than UAE and UK

HAQQ enforces jurisdiction across 200+ countries in seven languages, with native Arabic and full RTL.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Full support

Partial

Not available

Feature

Qanooni

HAQQ

AI Legal Drafting

AI Contract Review

Legal Research

Multi-Document Analysis

Risk Identification

Persistent Knowledge Base

Context-Aware AI

Practice Management

Billing & Invoicing

200+ Countries

7 Languages (incl. Arabic RTL)

Transparent Pricing

404 Not Foundchecked 2026-08-26

MS Word Integration

On-Premise Deployment

16 Free Legal Tools

Real venture backing behind the Word-plugin approach

It holds SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification, runs on Microsoft Azure, and states client data is not used to train its models — a real, verifiable security posture for a young company.

No public pricing, and claims we could not independently confirm

A plugin inside the document, not the practice around it

HAQQ connects the same kind of drafting to the matter, the client and the bill in one system, rather than leaving the practice layer to whatever tools a firm already has around Word.

Which one should you pick?

Choose Qanooni

Your lawyers already live in Microsoft Word and Outlook and you want AI drafting, review and research delivered exactly there, with no new interface to learn.
You want a young, venture-backed vendor with real SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certification and are comfortable with quote-based rather than published pricing.
Your practice is concentrated in the UAE and UK, Qanooni's stated markets.

Choose HAQQ

You want published pricing you can evaluate yourself, with a free tier, rather than a demo-and-quote process.
You need the drafting connected to a matter, a client and an invoice in one system.
You need jurisdiction coverage beyond the UAE and UK — HAQQ enforces jurisdiction across 200+ countries.

The verdict

Best for: UAE and UK firms that specifically want AI inside their existing Word and Outlook workflow; firms wanting one integrated platform with billing and broader jurisdiction need HAQQ instead.

Written by HAQQ. We make one of the two products compared here - read it as a vendor's argument, and check the linked sources. Qanooni · HAQQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Qanooni work inside Microsoft Word?

Yes, and that is one of its real strengths, with Outlook support as well. HAQQ works in the browser and mobile with Word export, and connects that drafting to matters, research and billing.

Is Qanooni secure enough for enterprise use?

It holds ISO 27001 certification. HAQQ holds ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and SOC 2, and offers an on-premise deployment option for data sovereignty requirements.

What does Qanooni cost?

Pricing is quote-based. HAQQ publishes its pricing, starting free with Pro at $20.83 per user per month including practice management.

Does Qanooni work inside Microsoft Word?

What does Qanooni cost, exactly?

How much funding has Qanooni raised?

Qanooni vs HAQQ

The Bottom Line

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Real venture backing behind the Word-plugin approach

No public pricing, and claims we could not independently confirm

A plugin inside the document, not the practice around it

Which one should you pick?

Choose Qanooni

Choose HAQQ

The verdict

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons

Documentations

Academy

Website

Qanooni vs HAQQ

The Bottom Line

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Real venture backing behind the Word-plugin approach

No public pricing, and claims we could not independently confirm

A plugin inside the document, not the practice around it

Which one should you pick?

Choose Qanooni

Choose HAQQ

The verdict

Frequently Asked Questions

More Comparisons

Documentations

Academy

Website