Lawvable vs HAQQ
Lawvable is where legal skills live. HAQQ is where they run.
13/15 ميزة يتفوق فيها HAQQ
TL;DR
Lawvable is an open registry of legal skills packaged as SKILL.md, reviewed by hand, mostly MIT or AGPL. Great for sharing and discovering recipes. But it's a catalog, not a practice. HAQQ is the system those skills run inside: every workflow lives in a matter, gets billed, leaves an audit trail, and obeys the jurisdiction you set. Pull Lawvable skills into HAQQ and they finally get a home.
Open registry, not a workspace
Lawvable distributes skills as files. You still need somewhere to run them with real client context. HAQQ provides the workspace: matters, a persistent firm knowledge base, and context that carries across sessions.
No matters, no audit trail
A downloaded skill has no concept of a billable matter or a defensible log. HAQQ binds every AI action to a matter with a full audit trail, so the output is invoiceable and review-proof.
Built for MENA, jurisdiction-aware, self-hostable
Lawvable skills are jurisdiction-agnostic by default. HAQQ enforces jurisdiction per matter, runs natively in Arabic and English, and offers on-premise deployment a public registry cannot.
مقارنة ميزة بميزة
Lawvable
HAQQالأسئلة الشائعة
What license are Lawvable skills under?
Most are open-source, commonly MIT or AGPL. They're free to use. HAQQ also ships free tools, and adds the platform layer (matters, billing, audit) on top.
Can HAQQ run skills published on Lawvable?
Yes. HAQQ is the system skills run inside. A Lawvable SKILL.md gains matter context, billing, and jurisdiction enforcement once it runs in HAQQ.
Is Lawvable a practice management tool?
No. It's a skill registry. There's no billing, no matter management, no firm knowledge base. HAQQ covers all of that.
