مهارات Claude القانونية: الدليل المفتوح للذكاء الاصطناعي القانوني
أكثر من 300 مهارة قانونية منتقاة لـ Claude ومهارات وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي القانوني - مُختارة بعناية من Anthropic وLawvable وSkala وأفضل مستودعات المجتمع. ثبّتها في Claude أو ChatGPT أو Gemini في أقل من دقيقتين.
كيف تعمل مهارات الذكاء الاصطناعي القانوني
من الاكتشاف إلى الأتمتة في ثوانٍ.
تصفح
ابحث عن مهارات لمجال ممارستك
حمّل
احصل على ملفات المهارة فوراً
استخدم
ارفعها إلى الذكاء الاصطناعي وابدأ العمل
Toolkit for comprehensive PDF manipulation, including extracting text and tables, creating new PDFs, merging/splitting documents, and handling forms. Use to fill in a PDF form or programmatically process, generate, or analyze PDF documents at scale.
Toolkit for comprehensive PDF reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with PDFs (.pdf files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing PDFs, (2) Creating new PDF documents with professional formatting, (3) Generating reports, documents, or layouts that require precise typography and design, or any other PDF reading or generation tasks.
NDA Reviewer
Reviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.
Playbook Reviewer
Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions.
Tech Contract Negotiator
Guide to negotiating technology services agreements, professional services contracts, and commercial B2B transactions. Provides three-position frameworks (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size tactics, objection handling templates, and concession roadmaps. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position pa
EU AI Act System Classifier
Classify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and map the compliance obligations that follow. Walks Art. 2 scope exclusions, Art. 3(1) AI system definition (7-criteria test), Art. 5 prohibited practice screening, Annex I and Annex III high-risk assessment with the Art. 6(3) narrow procedural exception, Art. 51-56 GPAI with the 10^25 FLOP systemic risk threshold, and Art. 50
Vendor Due Diligence
Framework for assessing IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners. Creates structured risk assessments across financial, operational, compliance, security, and reputational dimensions with regulatory checklists (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, SOX). Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting third-party risk assessments for procurement, (3) Performing c
AI Governance Reviewer
Conduct AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk reviews of internal AI use cases, AI product features, LLM workflows, or third-party AI vendors. The skill runs a structured intake process, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a governance review with score
Icelandic Company Formation
Use this skill when asked about forming, registering, or structuring a company in Iceland. Triggers on questions about Icelandic business entities (ehf, hf, sf, svf, ses), capital requirements, registration with Fyrirtækjaskrá, governance structures, or choosing the right entity type.
Shareholder Disclosure Petition Drafter
Guide for drafting emergency court filings (assignation en référé) to force disclosure of corporate documents to a shareholder under Article L. 238-1 of the French Commercial Code. Use when a shareholder is denied access to annual accounts, management reports, or meeting minutes.
Privacy Policy Generator
Guide for drafting privacy policies compliant with GDPR. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a privacy policy for a website or application.
DPIA Sentinel
GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Covers threshold assessment, multi-jurisdictional blacklist checks (DE, FR, IE, BE, NL, IT, PL), 5x5 risk scoring, necessity/proportionality analysis, mitigation mapping, Art. 36 prior consultation, AI dual-phase analysis, an
GDPR Breach Sentinel
Incident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Covers breach risk assessment using ENISA severity methodology, Controller vs Processor obligations, 72-hour notification clock management, EDPB case matching, cross-border Lead SA determination, AI Act Art. 62 intersection, mitigation playbooks, and audit-ready .docx document generation.
Dismissal Notification Generator
Guide for drafting dismissal notifications compliant with French labor law. Use when the user asks to draft, prepare, create or edit a termination letter, particularly for serious misconduct, gross misconduct, or personal grounds. The skill guides the collection of precise information and the drafting of a legally sound notification with all mandatory elements under French law.
Icelandic Labour Law
Use this skill when asked about Icelandic employment law, labour relations, workplace rights, or collective agreements. Triggers on questions about hiring, termination, working conditions, parental leave, trade unions, collective bargaining, workplace safety, or the Félagsdómur labour court in Iceland.
Originality In European Copyright
Determines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra and Calinescu) and the four EU directive provisions on originality. It argues from one of two positions: pro-rightsholder (establishing that the work is original) o
Icelandic EEA Gap Analysis
Use this skill when asked to analyze how Iceland has implemented an EU directive or regulation into national law, identify gaps between EU/EEA law and Icelandic implementation, or assess Iceland's compliance with EEA obligations. Triggers on questions about EEA transposition, ESA infringement, or EU-Iceland legal gaps.
Customs Trade Law
U.S. customs and trade-law research assistant for HTS classification, CROSS ruling research, CIT/CAFC decision briefing, duty compilation (General + Special + Chapter 99 + AD/CVD + MPF/HMF), country of origin determination, FTA qualification, and end-to-end import compliance review. Triggers on product classification, tariff questions, customs rulings, trade remedy screening (Section 301/232/201),
Tabular Review
Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations.
Persuasive Legal Writing
Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. Covers both prose craft (clarity, concrete examples, parallel construction, voice, strategic quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings), plus a dedicated
Canned Response Generator
Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.
Legal AI Simulator
Framework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use
Mandarinat
Academic assistant for law professors and researchers. Six tasks: (1) in-depth legal research with doctrinal emphasis, (2) document proofreading with reference verification, Word comments, plagiarism/AI detection cues, and argumentative consistency, (3) creation of topics and answer keys for university law exercises, (4) updating courses, textbooks, and legal documents, (5) course creation with DO
Proofreader
Optimizes Claude for proofreading French texts, whether literary, technical, or professional. Grammar and spelling checks, detection of barbarisms, and stylistic suggestions.
Outside Counsel Billing and Performance Reviewer
Reviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before bringing in external data. Produces invoice review findings, MBR/QBR scorecards, dispute logs, and management reports. For demonstration purposes only and not pro
Matter Intake Scoping
Matter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new matter, running a kickoff, defining scope, mapping stakeholders, or inheriting a matter mid-flight.
Meeting Briefing Preparator
Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
Statute Analyzer
Guide for reading, interpreting, and applying statutes, regulations, and rules in legal and compliance contexts. Use when the user asks about (1) how to read and interpret statutes, regulations, or rules, (2) statutory interpretation methods and canons of construction, (3) understanding legislative intent, (4) applying statutes to specific legal situations, (5) extracting requirements from legal t
Red Team Verifier
Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal documents, fact-checking regulatory content, performing red team review, or quality assurance before distribution to clients or stakeholders.
Summary Debt Recovery Petition Drafter
Guide for drafting emergency court filings (assignation en référé) before the Commercial Court to recover unpaid commercial debts. Use when a creditor needs to obtain a fast-track court order for payment of undisputed invoices.
Judicial First Impression
Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to pers
NIL Contract Reviewer
NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) contract analysis for NCAA student-athletes from the athlete's perspective. Use when user says 'review this NIL contract', 'analyze this NIL deal', 'check this athlete agreement', 'review my NIL agreement', or uploads a PDF NIL contract for review. Identifies red flags, missing protections, and compliance issues. Produces a structured review memorandum with negotiat
Word
Toolkit for comprehensive document reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with Word documents (.docx files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing DOCX files, (2) Creating new Word documents with professional formatting, (3) Editing documents requiring precise typography and layout, or any other DOCX reading or generation tasks.
Word Editor
Edit, query, and transform Word documents (.docx) with the SuperDoc CLI. Use when the user asks to read, search, modify, format, comment, track changes, or review changes in .docx files. Triggers on any task involving Word documents — text replacement, redlining, contract markup, template filling, bulk edits, content extraction, or document review.
Word
Toolkit for comprehensive document creation, editing, and analysis with support for tracked changes, comments, formatting preservation, and text extraction. Use to work with professional documents (.docx files) for: (1) Creating new documents, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with tracked changes, (4) Adding comments, or any other document tasks
Self-Creation
Guide for creating effective skills. Use when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends the model's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
Self-Improvement
Guide to analyze a current work session and propose improvements to skills. Use (1) automatically after working with a skill to capture learnings, (2) when the user suggests improvements, corrections, or additions during a skill-related session, or (3) when the user manually invokes `self-improve`.
VS Code Extension
Build VS Code extensions from scratch or convert existing JS/React/Vue apps. Supports commands, webviews (React/Vue), custom editors, tree views, and AI agent integration via file-bridge IPC. Use when user wants to create a VS Code extension, convert a web app to an extension, add webviews or custom UIs to VS Code, implement tree views, build custom file editors, integrate with AI agents, or packa
Security Review
Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use when the user requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help.
Flash Case Law Research
Rapid Italian case law research producing an initial orientation framework on a given legal topic. Searches the Corte di Cassazione, TAR, Consiglio di Stato, and Italian legal databases (DeJure, Italgiure) for relevant rulings, summarizes the prevailing jurisprudential orientation, flags conflicting decisions, and surfaces operational implications for opinions or strategy. Output is a structured s
EN-UK Legal Translation
A skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL tool. Unique features: * Skill has built-in English general lexicons and per-language sub-lexicons (phrasebooks) covering M&A, IP, IT/SaaS, finance, tax, l
Source Locked Verification
Forces Claude to answer only from user-provided materials and online sources it has actually accessed. No inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source, with statements categorised as expressly stated, verified online, supported, not found, or labelled inference. Built for legal and evidential work where fidelity
Legal Reasoning
Models the legal reasoning of a French judge when analyzing civil cases. Use this skill to analyze a dispute and identify legal issues, construct a structured legal argument (syllogism), draft the reasoning for a civil judgment, search for applicable case law and statutes via Judilibre and Légifrance, legally characterize facts and acts, and distinguish between claims, grounds, and arguments. Base
NIST AI RMF
This skill helps you apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and can quote AI RMF subcategories and GenAI profile action IDs verbatim from NIST AI 100-1 and 600-1. The skill routes you to the correct category as needed and has three modes, picked automatically from your question: 1. Consult: “What should I do per the AI RMF for this system?” 2. Governance Plan: “What should our AI governa
Contract Risk Analyzer
Analyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language, and provides negotiation guidance.
Swiss Legal Source Authority Triage
Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingua
Connecticut Divorce Planner
Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child supp
Thesis Search
Research, mapping, and analysis of French doctoral theses via theses.fr (ABES API) and TEL (HAL). Specialized in law, with filtering by legal subdiscipline. Also open to other academic fields. Capabilities: (1) multi-criteria search — topic, supervisor, examination committee, institution, doctoral school, period, defended/in-progress status, discipline; (2) academic mapping — who supervis
Employment Law Research
This Skill creates a research brief for an area of US employment law. The brief can address a specific question or be a multi-state survey. It'll include citations to primary sources (e.g. statutes, rule, government guidance), and reputable secondary sources like client alerts and multi-state surveys from top law firms and articles from legal publications (e.g. National Law Review).
Legal Design Assessment
Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it
Board Resolutions Review
Review board/stockholder resolutions for corporate authority, quorum, securities authorization, and execution. Triggers: (1) 'check resolutions' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate' / 'template' → Skala templates URL. Jurisdiction: Delaware, USA.
Client Alert Drafting
Draft professional legal client alerts and publications that inform clients about significant legal developments. Use when asked to: write a client alert, draft a legal update, create a publication about new legislation/regulations/case law, or prepare a legal briefing for clients. Supports all practice areas including corporate, litigation, regulatory, employment, tax, IP, and more. Output availa
Contractor Agreement Review
Review contractor/consulting agreements for misclassification, IP, liability, and termination issues. Triggers: (1) 'check contract' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate' / 'template' → Skala template URL. Jurisdiction: New York, USA.
Influencer Agreement Review
Review influencer/creator agreements for content rights, exclusivity, FTC compliance (16 CFR 255), AI/Synthetic Media consent, whitelisting/paid usage, and platform-specific requirements. Covers: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube. Includes AI Influencer/Virtual Influencer guidance. Triggers: (1) 'check contract' → checklist review, (2) 'advise' / 'review' → full consultation with playbook, (3) 'generate'
Jurisdiction Advisor
Advise startup founders on choosing the best jurisdiction and legal entity for their business. Triggers when users ask about where to incorporate, which state/country to register a company, choosing between Delaware vs other states, offshore vs US incorporation, entity types (C-Corp, LLC, PBC), or jurisdiction selection for specific industries (crypto, AI, SaaS, GameDev, solopreneurs). Also trigge
Open Source License
Open Source License guidance, selection, compliance review, and drafting. Use this skill when users ask about choosing open source licenses, checking license compatibility, reviewing projects for OSS compliance, generating LICENSE/NOTICE files, or understanding specific license terms. Triggers include questions about MIT, Apache, GPL, BSD, LGPL, AGPL, copyleft, permissive licenses, license compati
Reg S Offering
Provides guidance on Regulation S offerings of securities under U.S. law. Helps determine eligibility for Regulation S exemption, identify applicable transaction categories (1, 2, or 3), understand safe harbor requirements under Rules 903 and 904, and navigate distribution compliance periods. Use this skill when advising on offshore securities offerings, Reg S transactions, or resales of restricte
Safe Review
YC SAFE Agreement review and advisory skill for startup founders and lawyers. Use when user (1) uploads a SAFE agreement for review/comparison, (2) asks questions about how SAFEs work, or (3) requests to draft a standard YC SAFE. Triggers on keywords like SAFE, Simple Agreement for Future Equity, YC SAFE, valuation cap, discount, MFN, pro rata, convertible instrument.
Saft Review
SAFT (Simple Agreement for Future Tokens) review and advisory skill for crypto founders, token issuers, and investors. Use when user (1) uploads a SAFT/token warrant for review, (2) asks questions about how SAFTs work, (3) requests to draft a SAFT, or (4) asks about token fundraising structures. Triggers on keywords like SAFT, token warrant, token side letter, future tokens, token sale, ICO, TGE,
Startup Due Diligence
Legal due diligence review for seed-stage and Series A startups (US, Delaware C-Corp focus). Supports both investor and founder perspectives. Capabilities include: (1) Interactive document review and issue spotting; (2) Document request list generation; (3) Cap table and SAFE/convertible note analysis; (4) Red flag identification with severity ratings; (5) Diligence report generation. TRIGGERS: du
Term Sheet Review
Review VC term sheets for pre-seed, seed, and Series A rounds. Analyzes each clause from investor or startup perspective, identifies investor-friendly vs. founder-friendly terms, flags deviations from market standards, and provides negotiation guidance. Use when reviewing any VC term sheet, evaluating investment terms, or preparing for funding negotiations. Triggers on term sheet, VC financing, Se
Legal
AI Legal Assistant — Main Orchestrator
Legal Agreement
Business Agreement Generator
Contract Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of two contract versions or two different contracts with change tracking, favorability analysis, and risk assessment
Legal Compliance
Compliance Gap Analysis
Legal Freelancer
Freelancer Contract Review
Missing Protections Finder
Identifies critical clauses and protections that should be in a contract but are missing, with urgency ratings and ready-to-insert language
Custom Nda Generator
Generates a complete, customized Non-Disclosure Agreement with plain English annotations, tailored to the specific parties and situation
Counter Proposal Generator
Generates specific counter-proposals for every unfavorable clause, with replacement language, negotiation talking points, and a ready-to-send email template
Plain English Translation
Translates every clause of a contract from legalese into clear, plain English with flags for deliberately confusing or misleading language
Legal Privacy
Privacy Policy Generator
Legal Report Pdf
Professional PDF Report Generator
Legal Review
Full Contract Review — Flagship Orchestrator
Deep Risk Analysis
Clause-by-clause contract risk analysis with severity scoring, financial exposure estimates, and prioritized remediation guidance
Terms Of Service Generator
Generates complete, GDPR/CCPA-compliant Terms of Service for a website or SaaS product, with plain English summaries for each section
Contract Review
Review legal contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, SaaS terms, and M&A documents. Identifies unfavorable terms, suggests redlines, and compares to market standards. Use for contract analysis, due diligence, or negotiation prep.
Ai Inventory
EU AI Act per-system inventory — track each AI system's role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor, authorized representative, product manufacturer) and risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal, GPAI, GPAI+systemic). Role and tier are assessed per system, not per company. Use when the user says "ai inventory", "add an ai system", "what systems do we have", "classify this ai system", "eu ai act register", or "ai system registry". argument-hint: "[list | add | edit <id> | classify <id> | show <id>]
Aia Generation
Run an AI impact assessment — structured intake, risk analysis, regulatory classification per regime in scope, policy consistency diff, and recommendation with conditions. Uses the house-style structure learned from the seed impact assessment in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "impact assessment for", "assess this AI use case", "run an AIA", "generate an AIA", "we need to document this AI system", "AI risk assessment for X", or follows a conditional triage result. argument-hint: "[de
Cold Start Interview
Run the cold-start interview — learns your AI governance practice and writes `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/ai-governance-legal/CLAUDE.md` from your AI policy, a reference impact assessment, and key vendor AI agreements. Use when the practice profile is missing or contains `[PLACEHOLDER]` markers, or when user says "set up ai governance plugin", "onboard me", "configure ai governance". argument-hint: "[--redo | --check-integrations] Available across plugins: AI Governance, Builder Hub, Commercial, Corporate, Employment, IP, Law Student, Legal Clinic, Litigation, privacy-legal, product-legal-cold-start, regulatory-legal-cold-start.
Customize
Guided customization of your AI governance practice profile — change one thing without re-running the whole cold-start interview. Adjust risk posture, escalation contacts, use-case registry entries, vendor AI positions, AI policy commitments, impact-assessment house style, or matter workspace paths. Use when the user says "change my [thing]", "update my profile", "edit my config", "tune my playbook", or "customize". argument-hint: "[section name, or describe what you want to change] Available across plugins: AI Governance, Builder Hub, Commercial, Corporate, Employment, IP, Law Student, Legal Clinic, Litigation, privacy-legal, product-legal, regulatory-legal.
Matter Workspace
Manage matter workspaces — new, list, switch, close, or detach (practice-level). File-management logic for keeping one client or engagement's context separate from every other. Use when working across multiple clients or matters, when the user says "new matter", "switch matter", "list matters", "close matter", or when any substantive skill needs to know which matter it's working in. argument-hint: "<new | list | switch | close | none> [slug] Available across plugins: AI Governance, Commercial, Corporate, Employment, IP, Litigation, privacy-legal, product-legal-matter, regulatory-legal-matter.
Policy Monitor
Keep the AI policy current with practice — weekly sweep of saved AIAs, triage results, and vendor reviews to find policy drift, or direct query for a proposed new AI practice. Use when user says "policy sweep", "does our AI policy cover this", "we want to start doing X — does the policy need updating", "run the policy monitor", or on a recurring schedule. argument-hint: "[describe a proposed new AI practice — or omit / use --sweep for crawl mode] Available across plugins: AI Governance, privacy-legal.
Policy Starter
Draft a firm AI usage policy from published model policies, adapted to your practice profile — a research-and-synthesis tool whose output is a draft for attorney review and adoption, not a finished policy. Use when user says "draft an AI policy", "we need an AI policy", "build an AI usage policy", "our firm needs a GenAI policy", or similar requests to generate a first-cut internal AI policy. argument-hint: "[optional — scope hint, e.g. 'firm-wide', 'legal team only', 'update existing']
Reg Gap Analysis
Diff a new AI regulation or guidance against your current governance posture — surfaces gaps, priorities, and a remediation plan with owners and deadlines. Use when an AI regulation moves (or you learn about one you missed), or when user says "new reg just dropped", "does [regulation] affect us", "gap analysis for EU AI Act", "compliance check against [AI law or guidance]", or pastes regulatory text. argument-hint: "[regulation name, or paste regulatory text, or attach a document] Available across plugins: AI Governance, privacy-legal.
Use Case Triage
Classify a proposed AI use case against your registry — approved, conditional, or not approved — and produce required conditions and next steps. Flags cross-plugin handoffs to privacy or product counsel. Use when user says "triage this use case", "can we use AI for X", "is this approved", "what do we need to do to use AI for X". argument-hint: "[describe the use case, or 'batch' to triage a list] Available across plugins: AI Governance, privacy-legal.
Vendor Ai Review
Review vendor AI terms — agreement, addendum, or ToS AI provisions — against your governance positions; flag training-on-data, liability, model changes, and AI policy consistency. Use when user says "review this AI agreement", "check OpenAI terms", "what did we agree to with [vendor]", "vendor sent an AI addendum", "is this AI contract okay", or attaches vendor AI terms. argument-hint: "[vendor name, or attach the contract]
Amendment History
Trace how a contract has changed across its base agreement and all amendments — either a summary of all changes over time, or a provision trace for a specific clause. Use when the user says "what changed in this contract over time", "show me the amendment history", "where's the latest [clause]", "how has [provision] evolved", or uploads multiple versions of an agreement. argument-hint: "[file(s) | [CLM ID (coming soon)] | [repository link (coming soon)]] [--provision <clause name>]
Escalation Flagger
Route a contract issue to the right approver per the escalation matrix in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md`, and draft the ask. Use when the user says "who needs to approve this", "escalate this", "does this need GC sign-off", "route this for approval", or when another skill finds an issue that exceeds the reviewer's authority. argument-hint: "[describe the issue, or reference a review memo]
Nda Review
Reference: fast triage of inbound NDAs into GREEN / YELLOW / RED so the team only spends lawyer time on the ones that need it. Built for sales and BD to self-serve before pinging legal. Loaded by /commercial-legal:review when an NDA is detected. user-invocable: false
Renewal Tracker
Show contracts with cancel-by deadlines coming up and warn before notice windows close, working from a maintained renewal register. Use when the user asks "what's renewing soon", "what renewals are due", "did we miss a cancellation window", "add this to the renewal tracker", or on a scheduled basis. Receives handoffs from saas-msa-review. argument-hint: "[--days N to change window | --missed for lapsed windows]
Review Proposals
Review and approve (or reject) pending playbook update proposals from the playbook-monitor agent and apply approved changes to the practice profile. Use when the playbook-monitor agent has surfaced proposals, when the user says "review playbook proposals", "what playbook updates are pending", or wants to step through deviation-driven playbook changes. argument-hint: "[no arguments needed — works from the pending proposals file]
Review
Review a vendor agreement, NDA, or SaaS subscription against your playbook. Identifies the agreement structure from titles, routes to the right review skill (vendor-agreement-review, nda-review, saas-msa-review), and integrates the output into a single memo. Use when the user says "review this contract", "check this MSA", "is this NDA okay", "look at this SaaS agreement", or attaches an inbound agreement for review. argument-hint: '[file path | Drive link | [CLM ID] | paste text]
Saas Msa Review
Reference: review of SaaS subscription agreements with attention to the terms that matter most in subscription deals — auto-renewal mechanics, price escalation, data portability, uptime SLAs, and subprocessor rights. Loaded by /commercial-legal:review when a SaaS or subscription agreement is detected. user-invocable: false
Stakeholder Summary
Translates a contract review into a summary the business stakeholder will actually read. Not a legal memo — a two-minute answer to "can I sign this and what do I need to know." Use when user says "summarize for the business", "write this up for [stakeholder]", "explain this to procurement", "non-legal summary", or when a review is done and needs to go to someone outside legal.
Vendor Agreement Review
Reference: review of an inbound vendor agreement against the team playbook in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/commercial-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Flags deviations, assesses risk, generates specific redline language, and routes to the right approver. Loaded by /commercial-legal:review when a vendor MSA, services agreement, or similar is detected. user-invocable: false
Ai Tool Handoff
Detects when Luminance, Kira, or a similar bulk-review tool is in use, hands off the high-volume clause extraction to it, and QAs its output per the trust level in `~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/corporate-legal/CLAUDE.md`. Use when user says "send to Luminance", "bulk review", "AI extraction", or when diligence-issue-extraction hits a high-volume category.
Board Minutes
Drafts board or committee meeting minutes in your house format. Auto-detects upcoming board and committee meetings from your calendar, asks for the agenda and any slides or pre-read materials, and produces a complete draft in the format learned from your seed minutes. Also handles written consents in lieu of meetings. Trigger: "board minutes", "draft minutes", "upcoming board meeting", "committee minutes", "written consent", or calendar detection of an upcoming board or committee event.
Closing Checklist
What's blocking close — maintain the closing checklist with status, critical path, and days to close. Self-updating: ingests new items from diligence findings and schedule builds, tracks status, surfaces what's blocking. Use when user says "closing checklist", "what's left to close", "checklist status", "add to the checklist", or on a scheduled status pull. argument-hint: "[optional: item ID + status update]
Deal Team Summary
Aggregate diligence findings into a deal team briefing at the right altitude for the audience — exec summary for leadership, working summary for the team. Use when user says "brief the deal team", "what's the state of diligence", "summarize findings for [audience]", "deal update", or on the briefing cadence.
Diligence Issue Extraction
Read VDR documents and extract issues per house categories and materiality thresholds, producing findings in house memo format. Use when user says "review the data room", "extract issues from [folder]", "diligence review", "what's in the VDR", or points at VDR documents. argument-hint: "[VDR folder path or category name]
Entity Compliance
Entity compliance tracker — initialize, report upcoming deadlines, update status, run health audit, export to CSV. Maintains a compliance-tracker.yaml built from the entity table, calculates filing deadlines by entity and jurisdiction, and surfaces what's due in the next 30/60/90 days. Use when user says "entity compliance", "filing deadlines", "annual reports due", "entity tracker", "what filings are due", "entity health", or "good standing". argument-hint: "[--init | --report [--days N] | --update [--from-report] | --sweep | --audit | --expor
Integration Management
Post-closing M&A integration tracker — phased workplan, consent tracking, contract assignment at scale, weekly status reports. Initializes from whatever deal artifacts are available (purchase agreement, deal summary, closing checklist) and connects to deal-context.md and closing-checklist.yaml from the M&A cold-start. Use when user says "integration", "post-close", "post-closing", "consents outstanding", "contract assignment", "integration status", or "what's left on the deal". argument-hint: "[--init | --contracts | --report | --update | --exp
Material Contract Schedule
Build the material contracts disclosure schedule from diligence findings, applying the purchase agreement's Material Contract definition and formatting per the agreement's schedule format. Use when user says "build the contracts schedule", "disclosure schedule", "schedule 3.X", "material contracts list", or when drafting disclosure schedules. argument-hint: "[purchase agreement path, or paste the Material Contract definition]
Tabular Review
Tabular review — one row per document, one column per data point, every cell cited to source. Built for M&A diligence ("review these 200 target contracts for change-of-control, assignment, and MAC clauses") but works for any batch review that needs a spreadsheet out the other end. Use when user says "tabular review", "review grid", "build a grid", "extract these fields from these contracts", "review these documents for X, Y, Z", "give me a spreadsheet of", "batch review", or points at a folder of documents and asks to compare them.
Written Consent
Draft a unanimous written consent of the board or a committee in house format, with precedent search from the consents repository. Handles multi-resolution consents, director conflict flags, state-law notice requirements, and signatory tracking, with a built-in scope warning for major one-off actions. Use when user says "written consent", "unanimous consent", "board consent", "consent in lieu", "UWC", or describes an action needing board approval without a meeting. argument-hint: "[describe the action needing board approval]
Expansion Kickoff
Kick off international expansion planning for a new country — gathers intake, runs EOR vs. entity framing, drafts cross-functional questions, surfaces country-specific flags, and creates a persistent tracker. Use when someone says "we're hiring in [country]", "expansion to [country]", or "first hire in [country]". argument-hint: "[country name]
Expansion Update
Update the status of an in-progress international expansion project — recalculates what is now unblocked, flags anything overdue, and surfaces the next priorities. Use when work has happened since the last session and the expansion tracker needs to reflect the current state. argument-hint: "[country name]
Handbook Updates
Diff a proposed handbook change against the current version, flag ripple effects and state supplement impacts. Use when user says "update the handbook", "add this to the handbook", "handbook change", or has a policy ready for insertion.
Hiring Review
Review an offer letter and any restrictive covenants — jurisdiction check included. Substantive rules (covenant enforceability, pay-transparency, salary-history limits, exemption criteria) are researched per hire, not stored. Use when the user says "review this offer", "can we use a non-compete here", "check this offer letter", "hiring in [state]", or attaches an offer. argument-hint: "[offer letter file, or describe the hire]
Internal Investigation
Reference: shared framework for managing internal investigations from intake through final memo — privileged investigation log, document processing with needle-finding, source coverage tracking, Q&A against the log, memo drafting, and audience summaries. Loaded by /investigation-open, /investigation-add, /investigation-query, /investigation-memo, and /investigation-summary; not invoked directly. user-invocable: false
International Expansion
Reference: implementation-planning framework for international hiring — EOR vs. entity decision framing, cross-functional triggers for tax/finance/HR, structured outside-counsel briefing requests, and a persistent gap tracker. Loaded by /expansion-kickoff and /expansion-update; not invoked directly. user-invocable: false
Investigation Add
Add data to an open investigation — documents, interview notes, or observations. Processes batches against the documented pull criteria, surfaces significant items, and logs everything reviewed for coverage verification. Use when new evidence, interview notes, or document productions come in for an open investigation. argument-hint: "[matter name or slug, then paste or attach data]
Investigation Memo
Draft or update the privileged investigation memo from the investigation log. Use when an investigation is far enough along to write the first memo cut, or when new data has been added and the existing draft needs updating. argument-hint: "[matter name]
Investigation Open
Open a new internal investigation matter — runs intake, generates the sources checklist, and creates the persistent investigation log. Use when a complaint or allegation comes in and the attorney needs to stand up a privileged investigation workspace. argument-hint: "[brief description of the allegation]
Investigation Query
Ask questions against an open investigation log — what witnesses said, where accounts conflict, what gaps exist, what the strongest evidence is on each issue. Use when the attorney needs to query the investigation record without re-reading every entry. argument-hint: "[matter name] [question]
Investigation Summary
Draft an audience-specific summary from the privileged investigation memo — HR, leadership, or outside counsel versions. Use when an investigation memo needs to be communicated to an audience that should not see the full privileged work product. argument-hint: "[matter name] [audience: hr / leadership / outside-counsel]
Leave Tracker
Check open leaves for deadline alerts and required decisions. Surfaces only the leaves that require an action and explains why — not a status board. Use weekly, or whenever the attorney needs to know which leaves have upcoming designation, certification, or exhaustion deadlines. argument-hint: "[no arguments — works from HRIS or leave-register.yaml]
Log Leave
Add a new leave to the leave register with the minimum information needed to start tracking deadlines. Use when an employee goes on leave and you want the tracker to watch designation, certification, and exhaustion clocks from day one. argument-hint: "[describe the leave — employee/role, type, jurisdiction, start date]
Policy Drafting
Draft an employment policy with state supplements where law differs across the jurisdictional footprint. Use when the user says "draft a [topic] policy", "we need a policy on", "update our [topic] policy", or names a policy gap. argument-hint: "[policy topic — e.g., 'remote work', 'parental leave', 'PTO']
Termination Review
Termination review — high-risk flag detection, severance + release, and final pay timing by jurisdiction. Jurisdiction-specific rules and release consideration periods are researched per review, not stored. Use when the user says "reviewing a termination", "can we fire this person", "term review", or describes a termination scenario. argument-hint: "[describe the termination, or attach documentation]
Wage Hour Qa
Jurisdiction-aware wage/hour and employment Q&A — classification, overtime, meal/rest breaks, leave, final pay — answered for the specific state/country with the controlling rule researched and cited rather than stated from memory. Use when the user asks any employment law question, or says "what's the rule in [state]", "is this exempt", "do we have to pay overtime for", or "can we classify this as". argument-hint: "[question]
Worker Classification
Classify a proposed worker engagement — employee, IC, temp, or vendor — by running the applicable jurisdiction tests and flagging misclassification gaps between the intended arrangement and what the facts actually support. Prospective use only. Use when someone says "we want to bring on a contractor", "is this a vendor or a temp", "how should we classify this person", or describes a proposed working arrangement. argument-hint: "[describe the proposed arrangement, or just start and I'll ask]
cocounsel-legal:deep-research
Use this skill whenever a user specifically requests legal research or Westlaw Deep Research, asks for CoCounsel Legal or cocounsel legal support, or asks a question that requires explaining, analyzing, or synthesizing U.S. law. allowed-tools: - mcp - Bash
Cease Desist
Draft a cease-and-desist letter (send mode) or triage one you received (receive mode). Use when asserting your rights against an infringer with a demand letter calibrated to your enforcement posture, or when an incoming C&D needs triage into a structured options memo with a recommendation. argument-hint: "<--send | --receive> [context, counterparty, or path to incoming letter]
Clearance
Trademark clearance first pass — knockout + similar-marks check producing a flag list, not a clearance opinion. Use when a new mark is proposed, when asked whether a mark is available or to run a knockout search, or when assessing likelihood-of-confusion factors before a full professional search. This skill never concludes a mark is clear. argument-hint: "[describe the proposed mark, goods/services, and jurisdictions — or just the mark and I'll ask]
Fto Triage
Freedom-to-operate triage — a structured first look at potentially blocking patents, not an FTO opinion. Use when a product, process, or feature is being evaluated for blocking patents, when asked whether anything stops a launch, or to build a claim-chart first pass against the most plausible patents before patent counsel review. This skill never concludes a product is clear to launch. argument-hint: "[describe the product / process / feature and jurisdictions — or just the subject and I'll ask]
Infringement Triage
Infringement triage across trademark, copyright, patent, and trade secret — a flag list with the factors cutting each way, not a finding. Use when assessing whether someone is infringing your IP or whether you might be infringing theirs, when a knockoff or copycat surfaces, or when deciding whether a matter is worth pursuing and how. argument-hint: "[describe the facts and which right — or just the facts and I'll ask which right]
Invention Intake
Invention disclosure first-pass screen — novelty, obviousness, §101 eligibility, bar dates, detectability, and strategic value. Use when an invention disclosure comes in and needs triage on whether to pursue a prior-art search and patent counsel review, investigate further, or decline. argument-hint: "[paste or describe the invention disclosure — or just the title and I'll ask]
Ip Clause Review
Review the IP clauses in an agreement — assignment, ownership, license grants, warranties, indemnities. Use when reviewing IP terms in employment, consulting, SOW, vendor, or licensing agreements, when asked to check the assignment language or license scope, or when an agreement with IP provisions is pasted or attached. argument-hint: "[file path | Drive link | paste text]
Oss Review
Open source license compliance check for a dependency list, a single library, or outbound code. Use when reviewing a manifest, SBOM, or repo for copyleft obligations and license compatibility, when asked whether a library can ship, or when preparing code to be open-sourced. argument-hint: "[file path to manifest / SBOM | package name | repo path | paste text]
Portfolio
Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work. argument-hint: "[--report [--days N] | --add | --update | --audit]
Takedown
Draft a DMCA takedown notice, triage one you received, or draft a §512(g) counter-notice. Use when asserting copyright through a §512(c)(3) takedown with the fair-use and perjury gates, when an incoming takedown needs triage into comply / counter / engage / ignore options, or when drafting a §512(g)(3) counter-notice with the consent-to-federal-jurisdiction gate. argument-hint: "<--send | --respond | --counter> [context or path to incoming notice]
Bar Prep Questions
Bar prep questions — MBE or essay, targeted at your weak subjects and bar jurisdiction. Tracks misses and comes back to patterns. Use when the user says "bar prep", "MBE questions", "practice essay", or "test me for the bar". argument-hint: "[subject, or --mbe / --essay / --session <n>]
Case Brief
Brief a case in your preferred format. In drill-me mode, makes the student state the holding first. Use when the user says "brief [case]", "what's the holding in", "case brief", or pastes a case. argument-hint: "[case name or citation, or paste the case]
Cold Call Prep
Prep for a cold-call — predict the professor's likely questions and drill them Socratically, flagging where you're shaky so you know what to re-read before class. Use when the user says "prep for class tomorrow", "cold call [case]", "what might [professor] ask on", or points at assigned reading. argument-hint: "[case name, or paste case text, or path to reading]
Exam Forecast
Analyze past exams from the same professor to surface patterns — subject weighting, recurring issue-spot traps, favored hypo types, policy-vs-doctrine mix — and forecast likely emphases for the upcoming exam. Use when the user says "what's on the exam", "analyze past exams", "predict the exam", or shares past exams. argument-hint: "[class name, with past exams shared or paths to them]
Flashcards
Generate or drill flashcards for black-letter memorization — Leitner-style buckets, per-subject markdown storage, drill mode with self-assessment. Use when the user says "drill flashcards", "make flashcards from", "quiz me on cards", or wants to memorize rules. argument-hint: "[subject] [--generate | --drill | --review | --stats | --session <n>]
Irac Practice
Grade an IRAC essay for structure, issue-spotting, rule accuracy, analysis depth, and organization. Does NOT rewrite the essay or show a model answer; tracks patterns across sessions. Use when the user says "grade my IRAC", "check my essay", or "I wrote this, give me feedback". argument-hint: "[paste essay OR path to draft OR --generate-hypo]
Legal Writing
Structural feedback on a legal writing draft (memo, brief, paper, exam essay) — organization, analysis depth, clarity, citation form. NEVER rewrites the draft. Use when the user says "feedback on my memo", "read my draft", or "critique my brief". argument-hint: "[paste draft OR path to file]
Outline Builder
Build or extend a course outline in your format, from class notes and casebook. Scaffolds — it does not write the outline for you. Use when the user says "outline [subject]", "add to my outline", "build an outline from", or points at class materials. argument-hint: "[subject, or point at class notes/casebook section]
Session
Run a focused N-question study session on a subject — MBE, essay, or flashcards. Tracks performance and updates the study plan. Use when the user says "run me 10 questions on [subject]", "do a session on [subject]", "let's do 5 cards on [subject]", or wants to drill a fixed number of questions and have the plan adapt. argument-hint: "<subject> <n> [--mbe | --essay | --flashcards]
Socratic Drill
Socratic drilling — it asks, you answer, it pushes back. Does NOT give you the answer until you've earned it. Use when the user says "drill me on", "quiz me", "socratic", "test me on [subject]", or wants to study actively. argument-hint: "[subject or topic]
Study Plan
Build or update a long-term bar prep (or exam prep) study plan — phases, subjects weighted by weakness, daily session schedule, adaptive to session history in study-plan.yaml. Use when the user says "build a study plan", "plan my bar prep", "schedule my studying", or "how should I study for [X]". argument-hint: "[--build | --update | --status | --cram]
Auto Updater
Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent. argument-hint: "[--apply to update all, otherwise notify only]
Disable
Disable a community skill installed through the hub without removing its files. Use when the user wants to temporarily quiet a community skill ("disable [skill]"), stop its hooks from firing while keeping its config, or re-enable a previously disabled skill. argument-hint: "[skill name]
Registry Browser
Search watched registries for community legal skills, showing matches with descriptions and offering to show the full SKILL.md before install. Use when the user says "browse", "search skills", "find a skill for", "what's out there for", or wants to add a new registry to the watchlist. argument-hint: "[search query]
Related Skills Surfacer
Suggest community skills based on recent activity in other plugins. Checks whether the community has built something relevant to a task and mentions it once, non-intrusively. Use when the user says "is there a community skill for this", "what else is out there", or asks for skill recommendations; also runs passively as part of other plugins' workflows.
Skill Installer
Install a community skill from a watched registry. Reads the allowlist first, fetches, shows the RAW SKILL.md (not just a summary), runs structural trust checks, runs skills-qa, and only writes files after explicit user approval. Use when the user says "install [skill]", picks install from browse, or provides a direct skill URL. argument-hint: "[skill name or registry URL]
Skill Manager
Reference: detailed uninstall, disable, and re-enable workflows for community skills installed via the legal builder hub. Safe by default — refuses to touch first-party plugin skills, confirms before removing files, and logs every action. Loaded by the /legal-builder-hub:uninstall and /legal-builder-hub:disable skills. user-invocable: false
Skills Qa
Evaluate a skill against the Legal Skill Design Framework — thirteen design parameters (including trust-surface, freshness, schema validation, and conflict detection), three legal failure modes, and a three-band verdict (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns). Use when deciding whether to trust a community skill before installing it, before deploying a first-party skill to your team, or whenever the user asks "should I trust this?" or "is this skill well-designed?". Runs automatically as part of /legal-builder-hub:skill-installer. argument-h
Uninstall
Uninstall a community skill that was installed via the hub. Confirms before deleting files, refuses to touch first-party plugin skills, and logs every action. Use when the user wants to fully remove a community skill ("uninstall [skill]", "remove this skill") rather than just disable it. argument-hint: "[skill name]
Build Guide
Help a clinic supervisor author a practice-area guide that configures how student-facing skills behave — intake questions, pedagogy posture (assist / guide / teach), review gates, cross-plugin checks, and local rules. Use when a supervising attorney wants to build or revise a per-practice-area guide, tune how the clinic skills behave for their clinic type, or set their teaching philosophy as plugin configuration. argument-hint: "[optional: practice area — e.g., 'immigration', 'housing']
Client Comms Log
Log a client communication — call, email, text, letter, in-person, voicemail. Append-only per-case record with dated entries, direction, medium, summary, action items. Works alongside /client-letter and /status client. Use when logging a call or client email, reviewing a communication log, or asking "what did we tell [client] last time". argument-hint: "[case-id] [--add (default) | --read | --summary | --patterns]
Client Intake
Structured intake — practice-area templates, cross-area issue spotting, conflict flags, and triage classification. Produces a formatted case summary the student analyzes and the professor reviews. Does NOT decide case acceptance. Use when starting a new client intake, running an intake interview, or writing up a new client's situation. argument-hint: "[optional: practice area hint]
Client Letter
Routine client correspondence from templates — appointment confirmations, document requests, brief "we filed it" updates. Plain language, required elements, supervision routing. NOT substantive advice. Use when a student needs to send routine correspondence, an appointment confirmation, a document request letter, or a brief status note to a client. argument-hint: "[appointment | doc-request | update]
Deadlines
Track case deadlines — add, cross-case rollup report, update, complete, close. Warns at configurable thresholds (default 14/7/3/1 days); overdue items stay flagged until resolved. The operational record for a clinic workload. Use when a student or supervisor needs to add a deadline, ask what's due this week, get a deadline report, or update a case deadline. argument-hint: "[--add | --report (default) | --update [id] | --complete [id] | --close [id] | --horizon=N]
Draft
First draft of a common clinic document — practice-area templates (asylum applications, eviction answers, protective order petitions, demand letters), jurisdiction-aware formatting, explicitly a starting point requiring student analysis and attorney review. Use when a student needs a first draft of a motion, letter, petition, declaration, or other clinic document. argument-hint: "[document type — e.g., 'eviction-answer', 'asylum-declaration', 'demand-letter']
Form Generation
Reference: DEPRECATED — use `/draft` instead. This skill has been folded into the draft skill, which handles practice-area document generation including form population. Kept as a redirect for migration. user-invocable: false
Memo
IRAC-scaffolded case analysis memo with research gaps flagged — the scaffold, not the analysis. Rule blocks are RESEARCH NEEDED, Application is STUDENT ANALYSIS prompts, Conclusion is blank. Use when a student needs to scaffold a case analysis memo, write up their analysis, or build an IRAC memo for a case. argument-hint: "[optional: specific issue to focus]
Plain Language Letters
Reference: DEPRECATED — use `/client-letter` for routine correspondence or `/status client` for substantive updates. Split into two more focused skills during the v2 rebuild. Kept as a redirect for migration. user-invocable: false
Ramp
Student semester onboarding — clinic procedures, tool walkthrough, practice exercises before real cases. Reads the handbook the professor uploaded at setup and teaches it interactively. Use when a new clinic student says "onboard me", "I'm new to the clinic", "getting started", or at the start of each semester; pass --card for the one-page reference. argument-hint: "[--card for the one-page reference]
Research Start
Research roadmap for a legal issue — statutes to check, case law areas to investigate, regulatory frameworks, Westlaw search terms. Leads and frameworks, NOT authoritative citations; students verify and develop everything. Use when a student asks where to start researching, wants a research roadmap for an issue, or needs gaps identified in existing research. argument-hint: "[legal issue]
Semester Handoff
End-of-semester case handoff memos — the mirror of /ramp. Produces per-case transition memos and a cohort summary so the departing cohort hands work to the incoming cohort cleanly. Reads deadlines, client-comms, and case history. Use when the professor or departing students need to wrap up the semester, build transition memos, or offboard a graduating/withdrawing student. argument-hint: "[--semester=YYYY-term (default: current)] [--case=[case_id] (for a single case)]
Status
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report. argument-hint: "[client | internal | court]
Supervisor Review Queue
Professor's review queue — student output waits here for professor approval before going to clients or courts. Only active if "formal review queue" supervision style was chosen at setup; otherwise dormant. Use when the professor wants to see what's waiting for review, approve, edit-then-approve, or return an item. argument-hint: "[--approve ID | --return ID 'note' | --edit ID]
Brief Section Drafter
Draft a brief section in house style, consistent with the case theory — every fact cited, every case checked, every argument tied to the theory. Use when the user says "draft the [section]", "write the statement of facts", "argument section on [issue]", or needs a first draft of a brief section. argument-hint: "[section \u2014 e.g., 'statement of facts', 'argument II']
Chronology
Build or update a chronology from declared document sources and uploads — dated events extracted, de-duped, and tagged by significance per the matter theory. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a production or matter file, says "chron from the production" or "what happened when", or needs a working, statement-of-facts, or witness-specific timeline. argument-hint: "[slug] [--format=working|sof|witness-[name]]
Claim Chart
Build or review an element chart — a patent claim chart (infringement, invalidity, or review) or a civil element chart for any cause of action or defense — with every cell pin-cited and gap detection as the priority output. Use when the user asks for a claim chart, element chart, proof chart, infringement or invalidity contention, element-by-element mapping, or asks "what are we missing to prove [claim]". argument-hint: '[--patent | --civil] [--infringement | --invalidity | --review] [--claim <n>] [--count <name>] [--target <slug>]
Demand Draft
Draft a demand letter from a completed intake, gated on a privilege / FRE 408 / waiver / admission checklist, with a .docx output, post-send checklist, and an offer to create a matter. Use when the user says "draft the demand", "write the [type] letter", or has a finished demand intake ready to turn into a sendable draft. argument-hint: "[slug] [--skip-gate] [--version=N]
Demand Intake
Pre-drafting context gathering for a demand letter — parties, facts, basis, leverage, BATNA, and privilege filters — written to a structured intake.md the demand-draft skill reads. Use when the user wants to prep a demand letter, run intake before drafting, or capture context for a payment demand, breach/cure notice, cease-and-desist, employment separation, or preservation demand. argument-hint: "[title] [--full]
Demand Received
Triage an inbound demand letter — extract fields, cross-check the portfolio, assess merit, present response options with a recommendation, and hand off to matter-intake or demand-intake if escalation is warranted. Use when the user says "we got a demand letter", "triage this demand", or shares an incoming demand to evaluate. argument-hint: "[path-to-incoming] [--slug=custom-slug]
Deposition Prep
Build a deposition outline for a witness — pull their documents from the eDiscovery platform, organize topics around the case theory, and surface impeachment material. Use when the user says "depo prep for [witness]", "build a depo outline", or "prepare for [name]'s deposition". argument-hint: "[witness name]
Legal Hold
Issue, refresh, release, or report on legal holds — drafts the hold notice as .docx, updates legal_hold fields in _log.yaml, and calendars the next refresh. Use when the user says "issue a hold", "refresh hold", "release hold", or asks for a portfolio-wide hold status report. argument-hint: "[slug] [--issue | --refresh | --release | --status]
Matter Briefing
Deep briefing on one matter — current posture, what's changed, next deadline, open questions, and a risk re-assessment check, ready before a GC update or outside counsel call. Use when the user says "brief me on [matter]", "where are we on [matter]", or needs a read on a specific matter. argument-hint: "[slug]
Matter Close
Close a matter — capture outcome, final exposure, and lessons, then archive it out of the active portfolio without deleting the record. Use when the user wants to close a matter, says "[matter] is done", or needs to record a settlement, dismissal, judgment, withdrawal, or consolidation outcome. argument-hint: "[slug]
Matter Intake
Intake a new matter — uniform questions covering identification, conflicts, source, risk triage, materiality, outside counsel, owners, legal hold, and key dates; writes matter.md and history.md and appends a structured row to _log.yaml. Use when the user says "new matter", "intake this matter", or wants to bring a new matter into the portfolio. argument-hint: "[optional matter name]
Matter Update
Append a dated event to a matter's history file and refresh the log row — captures new developments, status changes, risk re-assessments, deadline shifts, and settlement authority changes. Use when the user wants to log an update on a matter, note a development, or record a status change against the portfolio. argument-hint: "[slug] [brief event description]
Oc Status
Generate weekly status-request email drafts to outside counsel across the active portfolio — markdown per matter, plus Gmail drafts when the MCP is available. Use when the user asks for OC status requests, weekly outside counsel check-ins, or wants per-matter status emails drafted from the portfolio log. argument-hint: "[--all | --slug=foo | --no-gmail]
Portfolio Status
Roll up the portfolio from _log.yaml — risk distribution, upcoming deadlines, stale matters, materiality totals, stage distribution, and flagged anomalies. Use when the user asks "where do we stand", "how many open matters", or wants a portfolio rollup or status across all active matters. argument-hint: "[--all | --risk=high | --stale]
Privilege Log Review
First-pass privilege log review — make the obvious privilege calls and flag the hard ones for attorney review without making close calls. Use when the user says "review the privilege log", "priv log", "check privilege on these docs", or has a log to QA before production. argument-hint: "[log file, or document set]
Subpoena Triage
Triage a subpoena served on the company — classify it, analyze scope/burden/privilege, cross-check the portfolio, and produce an objections framework, compliance plan, and deadline calendar. Use when the user says "we got a subpoena", "served with a subpoena", or shares a subpoena, CID, or third-party document request to evaluate. argument-hint: "[path-to-subpoena] [--slug=custom-slug]
Dpa Review
Review a Data Processing Agreement against your DPA playbook — auto-detects whether you're processor or controller and applies the right half of the playbook. Use when the user says "review this DPA", "check this data processing addendum", "customer sent their DPA", "is this DPA okay", or attaches a DPA. argument-hint: "[file | Drive link | paste text]
Dsar Response
Walk through a Data Subject Access Request (or deletion, portability, correction request) and draft the response — verify identity, locate data system-by-system, assess exemptions, draft the acknowledgment and substantive response letters. Use when a DSAR comes in, the user pastes an access/deletion/portability/correction request, or says "DSAR came in", "access request", "right to be forgotten", or "someone wants their data". argument-hint: "[paste the request, or describe it]
Pia Generation
Generate a Privacy Impact Assessment in house format for a new feature, product, or processing activity, using the structure learned from your seed PIA. Use when the user says "write a PIA", "privacy impact assessment for", "do we need a PIA for this", "privacy review this feature", or describes a new data processing activity. argument-hint: "[feature name or description]
Feature Risk Assessment
Deeper risk assessment for a single feature or product area when the launch review found something that needs more than a line item. Structured analysis: what could go wrong, how likely, how bad, what mitigates it. Use when user says "deep dive on this risk", "risk assessment for [feature]", "what could go wrong with", or when launch-review flags a novel issue.
Is This A Problem
Fast "is this a problem?" answer for the quick Slack question — pattern-matches against your calibration. Use when the user says "is this a problem", "quick question", "can we do X", "do I need legal review for", "sanity check", or pastes a PM's question that needs a same-minute fine / needs a look / hold call. argument-hint: "[the question]
Launch Review
Full launch review against your framework and risk calibration. Use when the user says "review this launch", "legal review for [feature]", "can we ship this", "what are the legal issues with [product]", or references a launch tracker ticket or PRD that needs a category-by-category review memo. argument-hint: "[PRD file | Drive link | tracker ticket ID]
Marketing Claims Review
Review marketing copy for claims that need substantiation, reframing, or cutting. Use when the user says "review this marketing copy", "check these claims", "can we say this", "is this puffery or a problem", or pastes marketing content (landing pages, emails, ads, taglines). argument-hint: "[paste copy, or file path]
Comments
Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID). argument-hint: "[optional: --decide CMT-ID]
Gap Surfacer
Reference: shared gap- and comment-tracker framework backing /regulatory-legal:gaps and /regulatory-legal:comments. Tracks open policy gaps with remediation status, ingests gaps from policy-diff, surfaces what's open and aging, routes to owners, and notifies gap owners via Slack with per-send confirmation. Loaded by the gaps and comments skills before doing substantive work. user-invocable: false
Gaps
Open gaps tracker — what's flagged and not yet closed. Use when the user asks "what gaps are open", "gap tracker", "remediation status", or wants to close (--close GAP-ID) or risk-accept (--accept GAP-ID) a tracked gap. argument-hint: "[optional: --close GAP-ID | --accept GAP-ID]
Policy Diff
Diff a specific regulatory change against the indexed policy library. Use when a reg has changed and you need to know which policies it touches and what the gap is, when the user says "diff this reg against our policies", "which policy does this affect", or "gap analysis", or when reg-feed-watcher hands off a material item. argument-hint: "[reg name, or paste reg text/summary]
Policy Redraft
Produce a proposed marked-up policy redraft that closes a gap found by /regulatory-legal:gaps or /regulatory-legal:policy-diff. A first draft for internal review — not for direct application to approved policy documents. Use when the user says "redraft the policy", "draft the policy fix", "mark up the policy", or when gap-surfacer hands off a gap for drafting. argument-hint: "[GAP-ID or gap description]
Fintech Agreement Drafting
Drafting copilot for complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreements — where a licensed payment-services provider engages a counterparty across several service lines (agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, marketplace), each with its own regulatory profile. Encodes a repeatable end-to-end method from intake and regulatory mapping through framework architecture, ring-fencing, drafting, and signature across five phases and fourteen steps.
cite-guard
Paste an AI-drafted legal filing and cite-guard extracts every case citation, checks each against a known-cases index, and returns a single hallucination-risk score plus a per-citation verdict — verified, unverified, or fabricated. One number tells you whether a brief is safe to file. Open source, built to stop the fabricated citations courts have sanctioned lawyers for filing.
Agent Authority Charter Builder
Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.
Agentic Delegation Audit
Use when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.
AI Audit Trail
This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.
Supplier DPA GDPR Analysis
Systematic analysis of a Data Processing Agreement (DPA) in light of Article 28 of the GDPR, EDPB Guidelines 07/2020 and 02/2024, the 2021 Standard Contractual Clauses, and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. Generates a structured, clause-by-clause report based on 18 criteria (13 mandatory + 5 supplementary) with a 🟢/ 🟡/🔴, a detailed analysis of international transfers (structured table + government access under the Cloud Act/FISA 702), verification of AI system usage, ready-to-insert contractual remedies, and questions to ask the provider. Designed for DPOs and GDPR practitioners who negotiate or audit data processing agreements.
Arbitration Clause Design and Review
Draft, review and stress-test arbitration clauses in commercial contracts, with guidance on seat, institution, rules, confidentiality, governing law and commercial fit. In more detail, this workflow helps users identify drafting issues, assess whether an arbitration clause is workable and commercially aligned with the transaction, generate clean revised wording, and produce concise explanations or negotiation points. It is designed for in-house counsel, lawyers and commercial teams, and uses public arbitration resources including model clauses, GAP materials and institutional cost/duration sources where relevant.
Website GDPR Compliance Audit
GDPR compliance audit of a website by a GDPR practitioner/DPO. Systematic assessment using a 10-section checklist: legal notice, hosting provider, forms, newsletter, privacy policy, cookies, passwords, trackers, processors and transfers outside the EU, and accessibility of data subject rights, plus a 22-item appendix covering Articles 13/14 GDPR. Produces a structured report (Markdown, optional .docx) with an overall compliance level, blocking issues, points requiring attention, priority recommendations, and cited regulatory sources (LCEN, GDPR, ePrivacy, CNIL decisions, EDPB, DPF). Tool-agnostic: automated browsing or fallback copy-paste mode. 7 decision trees for edge cases. The practitioner validates all statuses before the report is sent to the client. Technical analysis only, no legal advice.
Azerbaijan + EU Website Privacy Compliance Audit
Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banner, consent flow, controller and DPO contact, data subject rights channel, cross-border transfer disclosures, AZ operator-registration references) and scores each against the applicable statutory requirements. Produces a dual-layer report: a plain-language traffic-light summary for business owners plus a clause-by-clause findings table with article-level citations for lawyers. Assessment-only, no drafting. Use whenever the user shares a URL or privacy/cookie policy text for an AZ-based or AZ-targeted site; also when the user mentions an .az domain, Law 998, the AZ State Register, ePrivacy, an Art. 27 EU representative, or asks "is my site GDPR compliant", "do I need to register as an operator in Azerbaijan", or "is our cookie banner lawful" even without the word "audit".
BACEN Compliance Sentinel
Comprehensive guidance on compliance with Central Bank of Brazil regulations: CMN Resolution No. 4,893/2021 (Cybersecurity Policy), BCB Resolution No. 85/2021 (GRSIC), Open Finance Brazil (BCB Resolutions No. 32/2020 and updates), and other BACEN prudential rules. Covers drafting and reviewing Cybersecurity Policies, Incident Action and Response Plans (PARI), Information and Communication Services Risk Management (GRSIC), consent and data sharing in Open Finance, API requirements, third-party management (outsourcing), and BACEN sanctions. Triggers: Bacen, Central Bank, CMN 4,893, Resolution 4,893, banking cybersecurity, PARI, GRSIC, Open Finance, Open Banking, financial data sharing, Open Finance consent, financial API, banking outsourcing, cyber risk, bank cyber incident, financial LGPD, fintech compliance, financial institution, DICT, Pix security.
Billable Time
When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.
Billing Cycle Manager
Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling, and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory).
Budget and Fee Manager
Build, monitor, and adjust fee budgets across the full matter lifecycle. At matter setup: translate scope into a phase-based fee estimate with contingency and AFA structure. In flight: run WIP reviews that explain variance, not just report it. When scope changes are confirmed: model the financial impact.
Chronology builder
Builds a litigation chronology from the disclosure bundle itself — every entry attributed to its source document, behind a CPR 31.22 implied-undertaking check, because documents disclosed in English proceedings may only be used for those proceedings. Adds a privilege screen and case-theory significance tagging, so the output is court-facing work product, not a loose timeline. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a disclosure bundle, a matter file, or witness statements, or says 'build the chron', 'what happened when', or needs a Statement of Facts ready timeline.
Client Explanation Translator
Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.
Climate Aligned Contracts
Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.
Collaboration Platform Advisor
Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. Outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or build simple automations.
Privacy Compliance Advisor
Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.
Continuous Improvement Engine
Capture, structure, and recycle lessons from active and closed legal matters. Three modes: in-flight capture (triggered by scope changes, risk events, status updates), mid-matter review (phase gates or quarterly), and matter close retrospective. Lessons are formatted for immediate reuse, not filed and forgotten.
Contract Intelligence & Workflow Reviewer
Contract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, approval routing, QA, and action recommendations. Reviews legal, business, operational, compliance, privacy, security, technology, and AI-related risks across contracts and legal documents. Supports NDAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs, procurement contracts, commercial agreements, contract comparisons, redlines, approval packages, clause research, and drafting. **Warning**-Comprehensive reviews can consume significant Claude/OpenAI tokens, especially for large agreements, playbooks, exhibits, schedules, and multi-document reviews.
Cpr Letter Drafter
Writes the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct — each of which has its own rules a generic letter misses (the 30-day debt window, the professional-negligence preliminary-notice step). It also flags the limitation deadline for a solicitor to confirm rather than stating it as fact. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms without a precedent to copy. Use when the user says 'draft an LBC', 'letter before claim', 'pre-action letter', 'pre-action protocol', or needs to start the pre-action clock before issuing a civil claim. Verify the current protocol before sending.
Central African Special Criminal Court
“Verification-first” methodology for the Special Criminal Court of the Central African Republic, a hybrid court seated in Bangui. Every citation is verified against JusticeInfo, FIDH, HRW, and legal-tools.org; the official sites often return a 403 error. Covers the Paoua case, the word “notamment” in Article 3, and complementarity with the ICC. Research aid, not legal advice.
Decision Ownership Audit
Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
Disclosure List
Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.
Disclosure Strategy Mapper
This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.
Doctrinal Research
Academic research across French, European, and international legal scholarship databases. Use this skill when the user requests searches for doctrinal articles, dissertations, academic books, or university legal publications — including comparative law. Primary sources: ISIDORE (CNRS social sciences aggregator including Cairn.info, Persée, OpenEdition), HAL (French open archive), OpenAlex (global open database of 250M+ works), Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, Persée (direct OAI), and CORE. Covers both francophone AND international legal scholarship with a built-in bilingual workflow for comparative law. Also triggers for: annotated bibliography, state of the art, legal literature review, author search, citation verification, bibliometric analysis.
Document Approval Tracker
Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies.
Word
Searches, replaces, and reads text in Word documents from the command line. Use when the user asks to edit, search, or extract text from .docx files.
Data Processing Agreement Art. 28 GDPR
Review, draft, or redline a Data Processing Agreement (DPA / Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / AVV) under Art. 28 GDPR, or prepare a Joint Controller Arrangement under Art. 26 GDPR (basic). Supports bilingual output (DE/EN), both controller- and processor-side perspectives, and two review depths — quick (Art. 28(3)(a)–(h) coverage) and negotiation-grade (clause-by-clause risk scoring).
DPDPA & GDPR Compliance Review
Performs structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as compliant, at-risk, or non-compliant with reasoning, and proposes ready-to-use model replacement language.
Due Diligence Gate
Use for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulatory, compliance, technology/product, and financial-model issues must be separated clearly.
Extraordinary African Chambers
“Verification-first” methodology for the Extraordinary African Chambers, covering the Hissène Habré trial in Dakar. Every citation is verified against forumchambresafricaines.org and legal-tools.org. Covers the judgment of May 30, 2016, the appeal judgment of April 27, 2017, reparations of CFAF 82.290 billion for 7,396 victims, and universal jurisdiction. Research aid, not legal advice.
ECCC Khmer Rouge Tribunal
Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findings against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the Internal Rules revision discipline. Research aid, not legal advice.
EN-US Legal Translation
A skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL tool. Unique features: * Skill has built-in English general lexicons and per-language sub-lexicons (phrasebooks) covering M&A, IP, IT/SaaS, finance, tax, litigation, employment and more. Full sub-lexicon coverage for 11 languages including Spanish, German, French and Chinese; others translate really well too. * Track changes read correctly when accepted/rejected, and typos are collapsed. * Definitions reordered alphabetically. * Headers, footers, footnotes and comments translated. * Translates to US English by default, UK English on request. * Quality gates throughout. * Takes minutes rather than seconds and is larger than simpler skills, but overall quality is higher. UK English default version here: https://lawve.ai/en/skills/legal-translation-uk-english-wouter-van-den-berg
Engagement Terms Billing Guidelines
Drafts, reviews, and maintains outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — the operational document that sets expectations for how external law firms bill, staff, communicate, and deliver legal services. OCGs are the single lowest-cost, highest-impact intervention available to an in-house legal ops function. 60% of in-house teams don't have them. Of the 40% that do, 87% barely enforce them. This skill encodes the methodology for building OCGs calibrated to the team's maturity level and producing the internal business case to get them adopted.
Epistemic Fault Line Audit
Audits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.
EU AI Act System Classifier
Determine whether a technology qualifies as an AI system under Art. 3(1) and classify its risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, GPAI with systemic risk, limited risk, minimal risk). Covers scope exclusions (Art. 2), AI system definition test (7 criteria), prohibited practice screening (Art. 5), high-risk assessment (Annex I + III with Art. 6(3) exception), GPAI check, and Art. 50 transparency triggers.
EU AI Act High-Risk Classifier
Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety route, all eight Annex III areas with worked examples, the Art. 6(3) exception and its profiling re-exception, and the Art. 25 quasi-provider trap. Outputs a structured decision block, a practitioner memo, and a JSON interchange artefact.
EU AI Act High-Risk Implementation Readiness
Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”
EU AI Act Knowledge Base
Authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents, including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification. Answers any EU AI Act question with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, and sector-specific guidance — covering penalties, timelines, GPAI obligations, high-risk and prohibited practices, and the AI Act / GDPR interplay.
EU AI Act Obligations Mapper
Map the full set of legal obligations based on role and risk tier under the EU AI Act, producing an actionable compliance matrix with RACI assignments, implementation priorities, GDPR cross-references, and a phased implementation roadmap.
EU AI Act Examination Report Generator
Generate a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. Supports multiple output formats: full assessment report, classification record (Prüfprotokoll), compliance register entry, and management briefing (Entscheidungsvorlage), with optional Word document export.
EU AI Act Role Determination
Determine the organization's role under the EU AI Act — provider (Anbieter), deployer (Betreiber), importer, distributor, or quasi-provider — and assess Art. 25 quasi-provider risk from substantial modifications, rebranding, or changed intended purpose.
EU AI Act Quick Assessment
Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output with risk tier, role, top obligations, compliance timeline, and jurisdiction flags, then routes to detailed skills for full analysis.
EU Data Act Compliance Assessment
Assess compliance obligations under the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) for connected products, IoT devices, data sharing, cloud switching, B2B fairness, B2G data access, dispute resolution, and international data transfers. Covers scope assessment (manufacturer, data holder, data recipient roles), user data access rights, pre-sale transparency, unfair contract terms, public authority data requests, cloud portability, dispute settlement mechanisms, international transfer restrictions, access-by-design obligations, trade secret protection, and cross-regulation mapping with GDPR, AI Act, and CRA. Use when assessing Data Act obligations, designing connected products, drafting data sharing contracts, responding to B2G requests, planning cloud switching capabilities, or evaluating dispute resolution options.
EU Data Act
Practitioner skill for EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include "Data Act", "Datengesetz", "Regulation (EU) 2023/2854", "Art. 4(1) request", "Art. 5(1) third-party request", "trade-secret handbrake", "cloud switching obligations", "Chapter VI", "Ch V exceptional need", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.
EU Data Act
A working tool for lawyers advising on the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854). Hand it the facts of a matter and it returns a classification memo, a drafting starter, a verbatim regulation lookup, an applied legal analysis, or a gap audit. Every output quotes verbatim from the bundled regulation and the European Commission's FAQ rather than paraphrasing from memory. Sixteen drafting templates cover what lawyers actually draft against: Art. 3(2) and 3(3) pre-contract notices, Art. 25 data-processing-service clauses, Art. 26, 28, and 29 public pages, the three-part trade-secret refusal pack, a safety and security restriction clause, and a third-party data-sharing request. Output goes to chat by default. A one-click Word export styled for client work is available after the chat answer, with a verified-as-of stamp and live EUR-Lex and FAQ links so currency is always visible on the page.
Fee Arrangement Structuring
AFA design, scope-to-fee matching, negotiation preparation, health check, and scope dispute assessment for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel arrangements. Design fee structures (fixed, capped, collar, blended, phased, success). Assess whether scope supports a proposed AFA. Prepare commercial positions for fee negotiations. Review existing AFAs against delivery data. Assess OOS claims and build dispute response. Trigger on: 'structure the fee', 'move off hourly', 'design an AFA', 'does scope support a fixed fee?', 'negotiate the fee', 'renegotiate the arrangement', 'is our AFA holding?', 'fee health check', 'cap is being approached', 'firm is claiming OOS', 'is this in scope?', 'is this OOS?', 'AI should reduce the cost', 'blended rate vs fixed', 'collar arrangement', 'phased fees'.
Financial Comparison Glossary
Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.
Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment - EU AI Act Art. 27
Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA interaction, notification under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.
Privacy Notice Generator
Draft GDPR-compliant privacy notices as .docx for any EU/EEA jurisdiction and audience. Supports five notice types (Website/App, Applicant, Employee, Business Partner, B2C Customer) across DE, FR, AT, IT, ES, NL, BE, IE, and UK GDPR. Covers Art. 13/14 disclosures, AI Act transparency, cookie policies, multi-language support, DPIA indicators, and post-generation compliance checklists.
Gouvernance des sociétés cotées
Skill open source d'analyse documentaire à vocation scientifique sur la gouvernance des sociétés cotées françaises (SBF 120). Il agrège, sous forme d'index sourcés à la page près, le corpus réglementaire et doctrinal 2020-2025 — rapports AMF et HCGE, Code AFEP-MEDEF, doctrine AMF, priorités ESMA, rapport sénatorial Rietmann/Gay, guide Paris Europlace — complété par recherche web. Sa règle fondatrice est le zéro invention : chaque chiffre, citation et page provient d'une source vérifiée, mot pour mot, en distinguant strictement le régulateur (AMF, ESMA) de la soft law (HCGE, AFEP-MEDEF). Quatre usages : restitution sourcée, analyse longitudinale, audit d'émetteur sur une grille de 13 blocs, croisement thématique multi-émetteurs. Ni conseil juridique, ni conseil en investissement.
GPAI Code of Practice Compliance
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Articles 51-56. Covers GPAI model identification (Art. 3(63)), systemic risk model designation (Art. 3(65), Art. 51, 10^25 FLOP training compute threshold), upstream provider obligations under Art. 53 (transparency, technical documentation, copyright policy, training data summary), additional systemic risk obligations under Art. 55 (model evaluation, adversarial testing, AI Office incident notification, cybersecurity), systemic-risk notification and Commission designation under Art. 52, downstream Art. 25 quasi-provider duties, and Art. 53(2) open-source exemption. Built for in-house counsel and AI governance teams reviewing LLM or foundation model deployments, drafting GPAI compliance plans, or assessing systemic risk thresholds. DACH: BaFin, BSI, BNetzA. Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and Serious Incident Reporting skills.
Legal Test Builder
Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on "legal test", "take-home", "mock exam", "contract redline exercise", "candidate assessment", "legal training exercise", "practice test", or similar phrasing even when informal.
Cross Regulatory Impact Analyzer
Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
Regulatory Deal Card Generator
Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.
ICC - International Criminal Court
Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Use whenever the user is working with ICC case law, OTP statements, ASP documents, or ICC procedure.
Icelandic Contract Review
Use this skill when asked to review, analyze, or draft a contract governed by Icelandic law. Triggers on requests involving Icelandic commercial agreements, consumer contracts, sales agreements, service contracts, or any contract where Icelandic mandatory rules may apply.
Icelandic Court Case Finder
Use this skill when asked to find, cite, analyze, or summarize Icelandic court decisions. Triggers on requests involving Hæstiréttur (Supreme Court), Landsréttur (Court of Appeal), Félagsdómur (Labour Court), héraðsdómur (District Court) case law, or Icelandic legal precedent research.
Icelandic Legal Terminology
Use this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions, or cross-referencing Icelandic and common law concepts.
Icelandic Privacy Review
Use this skill when asked to review data protection or privacy compliance under Icelandic law and GDPR. Triggers on requests involving personal data processing, privacy policies, DPIA assessments, kennitala handling, Persónuvernd filings, or cross-border data transfers from Iceland.
ICTY / ICTR / IRMCT
Verification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-number transition (Karadžić, Mladić) and the protective-measures rule. Research aid, not legal advice.
Indian DPDP Act Consent Notice
Draft or review a DPDPA-compliant consent notice under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025. Provide basic details about your business and this skill handles the rest - building a notice tailored to your operations, with all required sections, granular consent boxes, and internal notes for your team. If you have an existing notice or privacy policy that needs to comply with DPDPA, this skill revises it too, flagging key gaps and changes made.
Indian Foreign Investment Approval Assessment
Assess whether Government of India approval is required for foreign investment in an Indian company under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019. The skill systematically gathers transaction details, evaluates sectoral entry routes and caps, assesses land border country restrictions under applicable laws, and delivers a preliminary compliance note. Produces clear guidance on whether the investment falls within Automatic Route or requires Government approval.
Invoice Review Compliance
Reviews outside counsel invoices against billing guidelines, flags non-compliant entries by category, and produces the documents needed to approve, reduce, reject, and communicate those decisions. Covers the full invoice compliance workflow: line-item review through to formal firm escalation. Works with or without an e-billing platform. Where an e-billing system is in place, LEDES format and UTBMS coding are hard gates. Where there is no e-billing system, invoice submission by email is the channel and UTBMS coding is a best-efforts flag.
IRAC Prompt Builder
Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.
Argentine Supreme Court Analysis
PageRank-based jurisprudential authority analysis for Argentine case law (CSJN, federal courts). Peer-reviewed methodology published in JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Ranks precedents by citation network influence with temporal decay.
Kosovo Specialist Chambers
Verification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once confirmed. Covers Thaçi et al., Mustafa, Pjetër Shala and Gucati & Haradinaj. Research aid, not legal advice.
Law Expertise To Skill
Turn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance playbooks, or professional feedback and wants a reusable Lawve-style skill. Do not impersonate the lawyer or claim to reproduce a person; distill only authorized, source-bounded capability.
French Legal Humanizer
LLMs produce legal-looking writing that isn't actually legal. Empty phrasing, vague attributions, systematic hedging, decorative Latin — a practitioner spots these tells within three lines. A judge does too. LawyerScrib is a skill for Claude Code and Cursor that cleans them up. It scans 17 patterns typical of AI writing applied to French law (briefs, legal opinions, memos, emails, formal instruments) and rewrites each passage to recover the voice of a lawyer building an argument, not a model generating text. The result: writing that takes a position — precise, with sourced references and a clear stance. Not neutral prose that "remains at your disposal for any further information.
Legal Analysis Forge
EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.
Legal Assistant
Expert legal research and drafting assistant covering French law, European law (EU and ECHR), and foreign law via LegalDataHunter, for legal professionals and researchers. Covers ten tasks: scoping, legal research, consultation, drafting of legal instruments, document analysis, counter-argumentation, contract analysis, legal monitoring, reference verification, and bibliographic harmonization. Strict anti-hallucination rule (Search → Find → Cite) with temporal verification of every normative text via OpenLegi. Use this skill whenever the user mentions French or European law, asks for legal research, a consultation, drafting of a legal instrument, contract or document analysis, citation verification via OpenLegi/HAL/ECHR, or is preparing case files — even when they don't explicitly say "legal assistant".
Legal Data Hunter
Install and set up the Legal Data Hunter MCP server. Use when the user wants to connect their AI agent to legal data, install legal-data-hunter, add a legal search MCP, or search legal documents across jurisdictions.
Legal Diagram
A picture may be worth a thousand words. Legal work sure runs on lots of words. So why words when picture? Stop rereading the files. Start seeing the matter. Latest updates at: https://github.com/nanparth/ai-skill-hub /legal-diagram turns dense legal documents, matter notes, and brainstorming dumps into clear, editable Mermaid diagrams to make strategizing and communicating clearer and faster. Use timelines and Gantt charts to uncover chronology gaps, flowcharts and decision trees to map litigation paths and negotiation possibilities, and entity relationship or class diagrams to clarify ownership, control, and corporate structure. Upload source files (.md, .docx, .pdf, .xlsx, or .pptx), paste text, or describe the issue you’re working on. /legal-diagram guides you through a simple interactive process to setup the skill and create timelines, Gantt charts, org charts, obligation checklists, litigation flowcharts, decision trees, corporate structure diagrams, and more.
Legal Document Drafting & Formatting
Produces properly-formatted legal documents in Word (.docx). The user provides the substantive content (instructions, attached files, project knowledge); the skill handles document architecture and formatting. * No precedent or template required * Seven document families: agreements, corporate documents, litigation, memos, employment, policies, correspondence * Jurisdiction-agnostic — works across any legal system the user specifies * Multi-Chain numbering, defined-terms convention, structured recitals, atomic signature blocks * Also reformats existing .docx to a consistent house style * Works in Claude.ai, Cowork, and Claude for Word
Legal Guidance Vault
Helps a lawyer build and use a personalized Legal Guidance Vault — a local folder of structured, privilege-marked entries capturing legal guidance they've given, searchable later by topic, person, or product. Use this skill when the user says "set up my vault," "archive this meeting/email/thread/doc," "log the guidance I gave on [topic]," "save my notes from [meeting]," "what did I say about [topic]," "find the time I advised [person] on [topic]," or "search my vault for [topic]." Runs a setup interview to learn the user's tool stack (meeting notes, calendar, email, docs, messaging, vault location), then generates a customized vault prompt they can reuse in any future Claude session to start archiving and retrieving guidance.
Legal Mdl Audit
Audits legal AI outputs and workflows for honest compression: unnecessary complexity, false simplicity, excessive caveats, hidden uncertainty and poor cost per legally acceptable output.
Legal Risk Assessor
Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
Legal Risk Assessment GoodLegal
Use for Legal Risk Analysis with Goodlegal MCP
Legal Transition Audit
Audits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.
Chilean Law Research
Jurisdiction-locked legal research assistant for Chilean law. Answers natural-language questions about Chilean codes, statutes, procedures, and case law, and must back every legal statement with the law name, the exact article, and a verifiable source link to the Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (BCN). It refuses questions about other jurisdictions and flags uncertainty rather than inventing article numbers, statutes, or case (ROL) numbers. Note: it has no live statute database — it answers from the model's own knowledge and directs the user to confirm each citation at the official source — and its output is reference material, not formal legal advice.
Legitimate Interest
Conducts a structured Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the full EDPB three-step test — interest identification, strict necessity analysis, and the balancing test with mitigation. Built on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), CNIL guidance (June 2025), ICO/DUA Act 2025, key CJEU judgments, and DPA positions from DE/FR/NL/AT/IT/ES/UK. Includes specialised modules for AI/ML, marketing, fraud prevention, children's data, employee monitoring, ePrivacy overlap, and cross-border, plus a dedicated Right to Object (Art. 21) response mode and structured LIA output. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR Art. 6(1)(f), legitimate interest, the LIA or three-step test, EDPB/DPA guidance, AI training data lawfulness, web scraping legality, direct marketing or fraud prevention legal basis, employee monitoring, the right to object, or asks for a balancing test — even if they don't say "LIA" explicitly.
LGPD Sentinel
LGPD guidance for processing operations in Brazil. Covers legal bases (Articles 7 and 11), DPIA, incidents (Articles 48-49), data subject rights (Article 18), and international transfers. Triggers: LGPD, DPIA, ANPD, data protection, personal data, consent, data protection officer, Brazil DPO, data incident, legitimate interest.
Litigación Latam
Asesor experto en litigación civil latinoamericana bajo sistemas de derecho civil. Está diseñado para asistir a abogados litigantes, equipos legales internos y clientes directos con estrategia procesal, análisis de riesgos y orientación sobre el proceso civil en América Latina. Al final de cada sesión redacta un correo electrónico claro que resume los hallazgos para el cliente. Cinco modos de operación: 1) Estrategia: cómo enfocar el litigio, qué vía procesal elegir, cómo construir la posición del cliente. 2) Riesgo: evaluar viabilidad, probabilidades de éxito, prescripción, caducidad. 3) Proceso: etapas del proceso, plazos, recursos disponibles, pasos inmediatos. 4) Asesoría cliente: explicaciones claras para clientes. 5) Email al cliente: borrador automático de email al final de cualquier análisis.
Litigation Deadline Calendar
A plugin for calendaring litigation and arbitration deadlines from scheduling orders. Scans scheduling orders and outputs in a calendar file for Outlook or Google Calendar. Also permits inviting other team members via calendar invites.
Local Counsel Manager
End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation.
Mandatory Verification
Mandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, draft documents containing factual claims, give legal advice or cite legal authority, discuss current events or public figures, provide technical or scientific information, state statistics or data points, or answer ANY question where the answer could have changed over time. Also trigger when the user asks Claude to 'check', 'verify', 'confirm', 'research', 'look up', or 'find out' anything, or when the user needs information that requires freshness, precision, or source accuracy. This skill overrides any default tendency to answer from memory. If a task involves stating facts, citing sources, or providing current information — use this skill.
Matter Allocation Instruction
Executes matter allocation and firm engagement from firm selection through to a live, properly-instructed matter. Match the right firm to a new matter using the right-sourcing framework. Produce a complete matter instruction ready to send. Generate the onboarding checklist that closes conflict clearance, engagement letter, OCG, and e-billing gates. Audit an existing instruction for gaps with a remediation note ready to send. This is the execution layer for a matter that has been sourced. Panel-design-selection (Skill 2) defines which firms are on the panel. RFP-pitch-management (Skill 3) selects firms through a competitive process. This skill instructs the selected firm and closes the onboarding gates.
Matter Plan Builder
Convert agreed scope into a structured matter plan — phases, workstreams, milestones, dependencies, owner assignments, and matter setup decisions. Use when planning a new matter, running a kickoff, building a workstream plan, structuring phases, or producing a plan to drive status reporting.
MCQ Generator
AI-assisted generation of MCQs (multiple-choice questionnaires) with export to Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot!, and Word. Supports light MCQs (gamified) and in-depth MCQs (evaluative), with single-answer and multiple-answer formats.
Mediation Dispute Analysis
Analyzes legal disputes for mediation purposes — reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence), identifying contested issues, summarizing each party's position and interests, performing legal analysis of key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions mediation, dispute analysis, settlement, ADR, dispute resolution, party positions, caucus strategy, or asks to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal — including when they upload case files and ask for a structured breakdown of who wants what or how the case might settle, even when they don't explicitly say "mediation".
Multi Jurisdictional Research
Multi-jurisdictional legal research and risk assessment using the Legal Data Hunter MCP (40+ countries, 13M+ documents). Use when the user asks about law across multiple countries, comparative law, cross-border regulatory analysis, or case law/legislation in any European or other covered jurisdiction. Triggers on jurisdictional comparison, cross-border risk, multi-country compliance, GDPR enforcement across member states, or Legal Data Hunter references. Also handles single non-French jurisdiction research. For French-only law, prefer goodlegal-research.
NDA Reviewer
Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.
New Sanctions Designation Screening Test
Generate a spreadsheet of test entries — newly designated names from OFAC, OFSI, and EU sanctions lists plus deliberate variations of those names — to validate that a sanctions screening system catches fresh designations and is tuned to the right fuzziness threshold. Use this whenever the user asks for sanctions list update test data, screening regression test data, screening QA, fuzzy match calibration, or wants to verify their screening lists are current. Trigger even if the user doesn't say 'screening' explicitly — phrases like 'test my sanctions list', 'check our SDN coverage', 'is my list up to date', or 'build me a regression set from the latest designations' should also invoke this skill.
NIS2 Navigator
Structured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a prioritized compliance roadmap. Deep German BSIG-neu coverage (BSI registration, § 30/32/38, incident reporting, Nachweispflicht) plus high-level jurisdiction profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain. Built on ENISA guidance and BSI #nis2know packages.
Normalisation Juridique Fr
La compétence Normalisation juridique FR nettoie un document Word rédigé en français juridique. Elle distingue deux régimes : les corrections déterministes (apostrophes courbes, guillemets français, espaces insécables, insécables des références — art. 1240, n° 21-12.345, 50 % —, ordinaux 1ère → 1re, ligatures œ, la loi dispose et non stipule, anglicismes-calques), appliquées directement ; et les réécritures de jugement (virgule avant « et », ternaires creux, formules emphatiques, harmonisations), posées en révisions Word soumises à votre acceptation. Chaque changement est consigné et restitué en tableau récapitulatif : on revient en arrière mot à mot — « défais 3, 7-10 ». La normalisation des citations reste purement formelle. Fonctionne en Cowork ou sur fichier Word.
Nuremberg-Tokyo Tribunals
Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice.
Opposing Counsel Review
Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An "if I were the judge" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.
Oral Argument
Tribunal-prep skill modeled on Neal Katyal's Nov 2025 SCOTUS tariffs argument and his AI sparring partner "Harvey." Five phases: (1) profile each decision-maker from prior opinions, questions, concurrences, and dissents — surface their doctrinal commitments and institutional concerns; (2) predict the bench — 3–7 likely questions per judge with the worry behind each, verbatim phrasing where confidence is high; (3) map escape routes — the narrowest holding each skeptical judge could sign without abandoning prior commitments; (4) spar adversarially — relentless follow-ups, calls out parroted lines, tracks which questions broke the lawyer; (5) hand the lawyer back to themselves with a < 150-word index card for the podium. The model is the sparring partner. The lawyer still wins the case. Use for oral argument, motion hearings, depositions, arbitrations, or stress-testing a brief before filing.
Outlook
Read, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2. Use when the user asks to check, read, or fetch emails, search by keyword or sender, download attachments, or chain email content into other skills.
Panel Design Selection
Designs panel structures, defines firm selection criteria, runs right-sourcing analysis, and assesses coverage gaps for in-house legal teams building or formalising their outside counsel panel. Panel design is not panel review. Design asks: what should the panel look like? Review asks: is the panel performing? This skill builds the framework. Panel-review-rationalisation (Skill 8) measures against it.
Panel Review Rationalisation
Executes the annual panel review cycle and ongoing panel governance decisions. Synthesises performance scorecard data, billing compliance records, and step-out patterns into panel-level recommendations. Produces the documentation for firm exits, coverage gap assessment, and competitive refresh processes. Covers the full panel governance workflow: annual health assessment through to firm exit and slot refresh.
Performance Scorecard
Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Encodes the methodology for collecting, aggregating, and acting on firm performance data across the relationship lifecycle — from building the initial evaluation framework through to the comparative analysis that informs panel retention and exit decisions.
Cookie Policy Generator
Guide for drafting cookie policies compliant with GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a cookie policy for a website or application.
Whistleblower Policy Advisor
Guide for (a) auditing an existing whistleblower system or (b) drafting a compliant reporting policy from a provided template. Covers EU Directive 2019/1937, the amended Sapin II law (Waserman 2022), Decree 2022-1284, CNIL guidelines, public sector requirements, and duty of vigilance.
PowerPoint
Toolkit for comprehensive presentation creation, editing, and analysis. Use to work with presentations (.pptx files) for: (1) Creating new presentations, (2) Modifying or editing content, (3) Working with layouts, (4) Adding comments or speaker notes, or any other presentation tasks
Pre Motion
Adversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation matter. Builds the strongest version of the case, then attacks it from four angles — procedural, substantive, evidentiary, strategic — to find where it actually loses. Returns a ranked stress-test brief: failure scenarios, evidence inconsistencies, blind spots, mitigations, and one brutal one-sentence verdict. Use before issue, before settlement negotiations, before a litigation-funder pitch, or before deciding whether to take a case.
Privilege Sentinel
Pre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Returns a SAFE/CAUTION/STOP band with cited factors, a discovery-impact line, and a redacted-safe rewrite.
Proposition Audit
Post-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdict for plausible-but-unsupported detail, and assesses rhetorical fairness on interpretive claims. Designed with a focus on healthcare law in England and Wales, but with general applicability beyond.
UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels
Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice.
Dismissal Challenge Petition Drafter
Guide for drafting petitions to the French Labor Court (Conseil de prud'hommes) to contest a dismissal for gross misconduct and request reclassification as unfair dismissal. Use when an employee wants to challenge their termination for alleged gross misconduct before the CPH.
Resource Planner
Team structure, gearing analysis, continuity planning, and competing demand management for legal matters. Use when setting up a matter team, reviewing whether work is being done at the right grade, planning cover for an unavailable team member, or managing a resource conflict across matters.
RFP Pitch Management
Runs structured RFP processes for selecting outside counsel — from drafting the initial document through evaluating firm responses and producing a defensible selection recommendation for GC sign-off. An average law firm spends 47 hours on an RFP response. That cost gets built into the price of legal services. Poorly structured RFPs produce responses that are incomparable and select by default for the most polished proposal, not the best firm. This skill encodes the methodology for running processes that produce genuine comparability and defensible decisions.
Risk and Issues Manager
RAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue, assess project risks, validate or challenge assumptions, or capture scope-relevant decisions. Also triggers when the user pastes email chains and asks what decisions were made, or needs to find buried decisions and untested assumptions in correspondence.
Runtime Admissibility Review
Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates legal, financial, operational, regulatory, customer, employee, patient, citizen, market, contractual, or reputational consequence.
Sanctions Screening FR
Outil d'analyse des sanctions économiques internationales et du contrôle des exportations pour Claude Desktop. Screening individuel en temps réel sur 30+ listes officielles (ONU, UE, OFAC, OFSI, DGT France...), analyse sectorielle, biens à double usage (Reg. UE 2021/821), régimes extraterritoriaux US/Chine (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), risque USD/SWIFT et cartographie de 30+ juridictions. Résultats sourcés et vérifiés en temps réel — aucune réponse de mémoire. Répond en français, anglais, allemand, espagnol, russe et chinois. Mis à jour au 19 mai 2026 (20ème paquet UE, SEUC UK, EO Cuba). Outil indicatif — ne se substitue pas à un avis juridique.
Sanctions & Export Control Analysis
Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries.
Scope Change Controller
Scope management for legal matters — baseline capture, in-flight change control, OOS documentation, and scope retrospective. Use when asked to review scoping assumptions, assess whether work is in or out of scope, draft a scope change notice, track scope changes, prepare an OOS justification, run an OOS report, prepare a scope call agenda, or review what changed on a matter.
Screening Alert Adjudication
Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.
Special Court for Sierra Leone
Verification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marriage holdings, the head-of-State immunity decision, and the fixed-term (no life) penalty regime. Research aid, not legal advice.
Serious Incident Reporting - EU AI Act Article 73
Serious Incident Reporting (SIR) for high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Assess, qualify, draft, and submit Art. 73 SIR notifications across the four Art. 3(49) harm categories (death or serious health damage, critical infrastructure disruption, breach of fundamental rights, property or environmental damage). Covers Art. 73 immediate, 2/10/15-day reporting windows, market surveillance authority notification, deployer duties under Art. 26(5), and cross-regulation mapping with GDPR Art. 33/34 breach notification, NIS2 Art. 23 incident reporting, DORA Art. 19 ICT incident, and MDR vigilance. Built for in-house counsel and AI risk teams handling AI incidents, building AI incident response playbooks, or managing AI failure, AI bias, or automated decision incidents. DACH routing through German market surveillance (BNetzA, BaFin, BSI, BfArM, KBA). Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and GPAI Code of Practice skills.
Settlement Agreement Review
Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.
Settlement Pressure Tester
This skill stress-tests a proposed settlement position before an offer goes out or comes back: the assumptions it depends on, your leverage and the opponent’s, the evidential weaknesses, the likely opponent response, and the timing and costs pressures around it. It structures settlement judgment for a better-informed decision; it does not advise whether to settle.
Self-Creation
Guide for creating effective skills. Use when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends the model's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
Skill Injection Defense
Audits legal AI skills, prompts, workflows, MCP/tool instructions, and agent packages before they are trusted or installed. It detects prompt injection, hidden or hostile instructions, unsafe scripts, suspicious frontmatter, credential exposure, exfiltration paths, persistence mechanisms, cron/launchd hooks, unauthorized network calls, and supply-chain risk. Use it before adopting third-party or generated skills; before publishing a skill to a legal AI marketplace; when reviewing SKILL.md files, skill folders, scripts, references, MCP manifests, or automation instructions; or when a user asks whether an AI workflow is safe. Paste or upload the skill, prompt, MCP/tool instruction, etc you want to review. The auditor treats the material as untrusted data: it does not execute scripts, install packages, or obey commands embedded inside the reviewed content. It returns a verdict — approve, approve with constraints, rewrite, quarantine, or reject — plus the key risks and recommended remediation.
Skill pour interroger Judilibre
Ce skill donne accès à l'API de judilibre. Vous formulez votre demande en français, il interroge la base Judlibre et renvoie les réponses. Attention le skill ne fonctionne que si des domaines supplémentaires sont utilisés et que l'utilisateur a rentré sa propre clé Judlibre. Ce skill et son auteur n'ont aucun lien avec la Cour de cassation ou Judilibre.
Skill Security Auditor
Audit an AI agent skill before installing it. Use proactively whenever the user is about to add, install, enable, or evaluate an unfamiliar skill — including phrases like "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill before install", "check skill for malicious code", "review this plugin", or any pre-install gate on an untrusted, third-party, or community-distributed skill bundle. Runs ten categories of static checks (code execution, network exfiltration, credential harvesting, persistence, prompt injection, supply-chain hooks, obfuscation, destructive filesystem ops, secrets, Trojan Source / homoglyphs) and emits a PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict.
Special Panels Timor-Leste
Verification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Crimes Unit caseload (391 indicted; about 88 tried) and the SPSC-vs-Jakarta distinction. Research aid, not legal advice.
Court of BiH War Crimes Chamber
Verification-first methodology for Section I (War Crimes) of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Citations are verified against the Court of BiH, the ICTY/IRMCT archives and OSCE. Distinguishes ICTY-referred (Rule 11 bis) cases from locally-initiated ones; covers Stanković, Janković and the Maktouf lex mitior ruling. Research aid, not legal advice.
Stakeholder Comms Planner
Stakeholder mapping, communication plan design, reporting hierarchy, and mid-matter comms updates. Use when setting up a new matter and needing to identify who needs what information, designing the communication rhythm, building reporting structures for multi-jurisdiction programmes, or updating the comms plan when the stakeholder landscape changes.
Status Report Drafter
Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.
Special Tribunal for Lebanon
Verification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-06 Akhbar Beirut/Al-Amin), and the 2011 terrorism decision. Research aid, not legal advice.
Sujet CRFPA
Ce skill génère des sujets d'entraînement pour les deux épreuves écrites de consultation du CRFPA : l'épreuve de droit des obligations (tronc commun) et l'épreuve de spécialité (civil, affaires, social, pénal, administratif, international et européen, fiscal). Chaque sujet est accompagné d'une grille de notation détaillée sur 20 points. Vous ciblez un thème précis, ou vous laissez le skill procéder à un tirage au sort couvrant l'ensemble du programme. Connexion aux MCP OpenLegi et GoodLegal requise : toutes les références d'articles et d'arrêts sont vérifiées sur les sources officielles, sans citation inventée
Tech Contract Review
Jurisdiction-aware review of technology and commercial contracts — MSA, DPA, SOW, LOE, NDA, SLA, EULA, IP assignment, vendor/supplier, and API/platform ToS. Classifies every clause (acceptable / negotiate / red-flag / missing), proposes redline replacements, checks governing law and data-protection obligations (GDPR, UK GDPR, India DPDP Act, CCPA), and outputs a structured risk summary. Built for tech and AI deals where training-data, IP-ownership, and liability terms need heightened scrutiny. Not a substitute for qualified legal counsel.
Timeline Generator
Build dependency network and critical path from a matter plan. Produce an interactive Gantt, flag near-critical tasks, and run what-if cascade scenarios when delays occur — showing programme impact and drafting communications. Produces filtered workstream or jurisdiction views for local counsel.
Trademark Search
Run an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is "available," "free to use," "clearable," or "already taken" — or asks Claude to "search the trademark register," "check USPTO," "check CIPO," "do a knockout search," "clearance search," "availability search," or "see if [mark] is trademarked." Trigger even when the user phrases it casually ("can I call my company X?", "is this name taken?"). Covers federal USPTO (TESS/TSDR), federal Canada (CIPO), common-law/web/state, and WIPO Madrid international. Output is a knockout availability memo with green/yellow/red verdict for attorney review. Includes professional-responsibility gating (AI-use disclosure, conflict check, scope confirmation) before substantive analysis. Not legal advice — produces work product for attorney sign-off.
Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA)
GDPR Transfer Impact Assessment for Chapter V transfers under the EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology, the CNIL TIA Guide (January 2025), and EDPB essential guarantees. Handles transfer qualification, Art. 45 adequacy fast-tracks, Art. 46 full assessments with country profiles for 12 jurisdictions, and balanced Art. 49 derogation analysis. Outputs a Markdown report, a .docx formal TIA, and a JSON delta for RoPA interchange.
Unfair Dismissal Screener
Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.
YC SaaS Drafter
Drafts a customized SaaS Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Runs a structured intake covering fee structure, data handling, ML/AI rights, implementation services, SLA, and governing law, then applies 18 always-on professional defaults plus 12 conditional decisions. Outputs a clean .docx ready for review alongside a lawyer-facing memo that itemizes every change from the YC baseline and flags each item still requiring attorney input. Aimed at startup founders preparing first-draft customer subscription agreements.
Without Prejudice Drafter
Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.
Excel
Toolkit for comprehensive spreadsheet creation, editing, and analysis with support for formulas, formatting, data analysis, and visualization. Use to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv, etc) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing data, (3) Modify existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Data analysis and visualization in spreadsheets, or (5) Recalculating formulas
Excel
Professional Excel spreadsheet creation with a focus on aesthetics and data analysis. Use when creating spreadsheets for organizing, analyzing, and presenting structured data in a clear and professional format.
Excel
Toolkit for comprehensive Spreadsheet reading, creation, editing, and analysis with visual quality control. Use to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing tabular data, (3) Modifying existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Building financial models with proper formatting, (5) Data visualization with in-sheet charts, or any other spreadsheet tasks.
Divorce Practice (Attorney Co-Counsel)
AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold across the full matter lifecycle, from client intake to final judgment and post-judgment work. Encodes the eight phases of a divorce matter (intake, financial disclosure, custody & support, property division/QDRO, discovery, drafting, negotiation/mediation prep, court prep) and forces verifiable legal research for every jurisdiction-specific rule rather than inventing one. Built around privilege protection in the wake of the 2026 U.S. Heppner ruling.
Privacy Policy Generator
Generate a jurisdiction-aware privacy policy through a guided intake that states only what you confirm. Covers GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA + ~20 state laws + COPPA + sector overlays like HIPAA/GLBA/BIPA), and global/MENA (Brazil, Canada, Australia, India, UAE/DIFC/Saudi), plus app-store, cookies/consent, and AI/LLM disclosures. Built for zero hallucination — every legal claim is grounded in a verified reference pack; it never invents a statute, citation, fine, or date.
لا توجد مهارات مطابقة
أتقن مهارات الذكاء الاصطناعي القانوني
دليل شامل من الأساسيات إلى بناء أتمتتك الخاصة.
ما هي مهارة الذكاء الاصطناعي؟
مهارات الوكيل هي حزم قابلة لإعادة الاستخدام توفر للمساعدين الذكيين خبرة متخصصة. تحتوي كل مهارة على تعليمات مفصلة وموارد اختيارية يستخدمها المساعد بشكل مستقل لإكمال المهمة.
فكر فيها كـ...
دليل تعريفي تنشئه لمتدرب. يلتقط كيفية التعامل مع أنواع معينة من العمل: المنهجية التي يجب اتباعها، والأشياء التي يجب التحق منها، والتنسيق الذي يجب استخدامه للمخرجات.
المهارات مقابل الأوامر
على عكس الأوامر التي هي تعليمات لمرة واحدة لمحادثة واحدة، المهارات تستمر عبر الجلسات. تحدد منهجيتك مرة واحدة، ويطبقها المساعد باستمرار.
Key Benefits
معيار مفتوح
أنشأت Anthropic مهارات الوكيل وصممتها لـ Claude. أصبح التنسيق معياراً مفتوحاً تتبناه مزودون آخرون.
هيكل المهارة
المهارة هي مجلد يحتوي على ملف SKILL.md بالإضافة إلى نصوص برمجية ومراجع اختيارية.
ملف SKILL.md
مستند نصي بسيط مع رأس صغير (الاسم والوصف) متبوعاً بالتعليمات الفعلية.
الإفصاح التدريجي
يبدأ وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي ببيانات كل مهارة. يحملون تعليمات SKILL.md الكاملة فقط عند قرار استخدام المهارة.
Skill Structure
nda-review/|-- SKILL.md# مطلوب: التعليمات والبيانات الوصفية|-- scripts/# اختياري: كود قابل للتنفيذ|-- references/# اختياري: إرشادات خاصة بالولاية القضائية`-- assets/# اختياري: قوالب، دليل العمل، أمثلةBest Practices
طرق التثبيت
يستغرق تثبيت المهارة أقل من دقيقتين ولا يتطلب خبرة تقنية.
Choose Your Method
مفتوح المصدر وقابل للتخصيص
وصول مباشر للملفات المحلية
بدون إعداد
كيف تعمل المهارات
يحدد وكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي تلقائياً المهارات ذات الصلة ويحملونها بناءً على المهمة.
أنشئ مهارتك الخاصة
تلتقط المهارات المنهجيات والخبرات بتنسيق يمكن لوكلاء الذكاء الاصطناعي اتباعه باستمرار.
الطريقة السهلة
أسهل طريقة لإنشاء المهارات هي من خلال المحادثة مع وكيل الذكاء الاصطناعي الخاص بك.
صف المهارة المطلوبة
"أريد إنشاء مهارة لمراجعة اتفاقيات عدم الإفشاء"
أجب على أسئلة الذكاء الاصطناعي
قدم تفاصيل كافية.
ارفع المواد الداعمة
قوالب، قوائم تحق، أمثلة.
اختبر وحسّن
شغّل المهارة على سيناريوهات حقيقية.
What Makes a Good Skill
الاختبار والتحسين
تتحسن المهارات من خلال الاستخدام. البدء بسيط والتحسين بناءً على المهام الحقيقية أفضل من محاولة توقع كل شيء مسبقاً.
كيفية الاختبار
يتضمن الاختبار وصف مهمة يجب أن تعالجها المهارة.
ابدأ بالتقييم
شغّل المهارة على سيناريوهات حقيقية.
التكرار والتحسين
عندما يخطئ الذكاء الاصطناعي، اطلب منه التفكير في الخطأ.
Pro Tips
Best Practices
مهارات يمكنك استخدامها اليوم
مجموعة منتقاة من المهارات التي بناها المجتمع
ABOUT
Toolkit for comprehensive PDF manipulation, including extracting text and tables, creating new PDFs, merging/splitting documents, and handling forms. Use to fill in a PDF form or programmatically process, generate, or analyze PDF documents at scale.
ABOUT
Toolkit for comprehensive PDF reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with PDFs (.pdf files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing PDFs, (2) Creating new PDF documents with professional formatting, (3) Generating reports, documents, or layouts that require precise typography and design, or any other PDF reading or generation tasks.
NDA Reviewer
ABOUT
Reviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.